Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet The Chief Justice Of America’s Secret Supreme Court (FISA)
Buzzfeed ^ | 7/7/13 | John Stanton

Posted on 07/09/2013 10:31:19 AM PDT by ruralvoter

The chief judge of America’s most powerful secret court is a 64-year-old man who has said his path toward the law began in part when he was stopped by police in the early 1960s simply for being black, and who once said he became a lawyer to “make an impact on the quality of life for people of color in this country.”

Reggie Walton is the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, whose 11 members are appointed directly by the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Revelations of broad spying by the National Security Agency have drawn unusual attention to the Court, which The New York Times reported Sunday “has created a secret body of law giving the National Security Agency the power to amass vast collections of data.”

(Excerpt) Read more at buzzfeed.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: court; datamining; fisa; fisachiefjustice; fisacourt; nsaleaks; privacy; reggiewalton; scotus; spy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2013 10:31:19 AM PDT by ruralvoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

Secret courts and unknown laws are the hallmark of a totalitarian regime...................


2 posted on 07/09/2013 10:33:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter
whose 11 members are appointed directly by the chief justice of the Supreme Court

yep
3 posted on 07/09/2013 10:34:50 AM PDT by novemberslady (Texas For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter
The HNIC has his brass ring. Keep what you win, and destroy what you can't keep.

It's like Zimbabwe or Somalia.

4 posted on 07/09/2013 10:35:25 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

always good to have a racist in charge.....must make O so proud


5 posted on 07/09/2013 10:35:36 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

There is no proof of that charge. According to Wikipedia, he at was a registered Republican at some point with Reagan and Bush appointments.


6 posted on 07/09/2013 10:37:25 AM PDT by ruralvoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Yes. Why are they always about what they can do for their own racial group, while a white politician or official would be drummed out of town for wanting to especially help other whites? Only whites are expected to represent all people. For that matter, they’re expected to represent others above whites.


7 posted on 07/09/2013 10:39:49 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

The Washington Post reported, “fellow judges and lawyers who appear before him say Walton’s decisions do not appear to be guided by politics but by a tough-on-crime mentality.” Walton is known by local defense attorneys as a “long ball hitter” - a judge willing to impose long sentences in order to deter future crimes.[3] In fall 2005, the judge was driving his wife and daughter to the airport for a vacation when he came across an assailant attacking a cab driver on the side of the road. Walton tackled the assailant and subdued him until police arrived. The D.C. police spokesperson noted in response, “God bless Judge Walton. I surely wouldn’t want to mess with him.”[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggie_Walton


8 posted on 07/09/2013 10:41:40 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (If youÂ’re happy and you know it clank your chains!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter
I repeatedly stated my belief that efforts had to be made in the area of social programs. There was an aversion to social programs among the people in the drug office. They felt that you didn't need to address the problems of jobs or housing or education or the host of other social issues that I thought had to be addressed," Walton said in the 1993 interview.

From the article. I didn't see his pic but I am going to assume he's black. Not sure how he's not a racist.

9 posted on 07/09/2013 10:42:19 AM PDT by raybbr (I weep over my sons' future in this Godforsaken country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

1991–2001 Appointed by George H. W. Bush as Associate Judge of the Superior Court of DC

2001 - nominated to the federal bench by President George W. Bush

2007 - Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts Jr. appointed him to a seat on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.


10 posted on 07/09/2013 10:45:13 AM PDT by ruralvoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Not elected or appointed by an elected representative of the people.

All of them selected by someone who was selected and who considers himself above everyone.
And a filthy infection of the body politic it is.

No wonder it's so easy for these bitches to overrule the vote of the people.
11 posted on 07/09/2013 10:45:55 AM PDT by novemberslady (Texas For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I won't ever forgive you for not making Scalia the Chief Justice.
Who gave you this guy?
12 posted on 07/09/2013 10:48:44 AM PDT by novemberslady (Texas For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter
Reggie Walton is the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court,

My guess would have been "sixth man off the bench for the Sacramento Kings"


13 posted on 07/09/2013 10:48:57 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

Reggie Walton, where I have heard that name before? Hmmm.


14 posted on 07/09/2013 10:52:26 AM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

yeah right....obviously your sarcasm indicator wasn’t in operation. Anytime someone talks about how he hated seeing people being arrested for being black I know exactly where he is coming from. Moreover I see what the FISA courts have done and that further confirms my statement


15 posted on 07/09/2013 11:17:16 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady
Which federal judges are usually elected, novemberslady?
16 posted on 07/09/2013 11:17:40 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ruralvoter

I ask, again:

“Why do we NEED the NSA, since we already have the CIA?”

Now, a new question ...

“Who is it who keeps the chain in hand for these federal lackeys?”

I believe that these “secret courts” are hemmed in, to looking after ‘foreign intelligence’, as much as the Grizzly bear will only attack errant hikers, and not other types of humans.


17 posted on 07/09/2013 11:23:54 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Secret courts and unknown laws are the hallmark of a totalitarian regime

For generations, the US has had secret proceedings of grand juries - entities which have broader power than the FISA court (this court grants search warrants, a grand jury can order arrests and bring charges as well as issue search warrants).

If this is the standard, then the US has always been a "totalitarian regime."

Which laws are "unknown"? The FISA court grants warrants under FISA, which is a very public and well-known law.

18 posted on 07/09/2013 11:25:44 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I’m complaining specifically about this court that enables the government to collect whatever it wants, whenever it wants.


19 posted on 07/09/2013 11:26:07 AM PDT by novemberslady (Texas For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady
I’m complaining specifically about this court that enables the government to collect whatever it wants, whenever it wants.

You realize that this court has been around for 35 years, right?

The vast majority of warrants requested in any courtroom are granted.

20 posted on 07/09/2013 11:32:56 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson