Posted on 07/12/2013 10:06:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Indeed, and with a touch of class.
Acquittal means angry riots and violence. Conviction means “celebratory” riots and violence which could be even worse as far as the killing spree. Because conviction sends the message that white folks have no right to self-defense.
Why didn’t Trayvon just sprint to the house he was staying if he was a frightened child? Why/When did it occur to him to confront Zimmerman. Did Trayvon stop somewhere, observe a goofy George Zimmerman, decide “I can kick his ass” and decide to do just that? If Zimmerman had hate in his heart AND an itchy trigger finger, he would have shot Trayvon long before letting his head be treated like a pinata.
I agree with you and disagree with you.
I agree with you that isn’t the way to go...just funny the media fishbowl that all world perspective is viewed through the prism of NYC...I don’t think you talk to women that way, especially in the south.
I don’t think he walks tho. I think he SHOULD. But the prosecution just stood in court and said “forget the lack of evidence, rely on emotion”. The judge WONT refute that in instructions. I think he’s going to get manslaughter then the Sea Hag is going to throw the book at him.
I hope I’m wrong.
I am not serious, but it begs the question, where is the blood? The hood was shot in the chest. He didn’t bleed?
They might have burned that bridge of civil suite vs Zimmerman by suing and accepting a settlement from the HOA.
Not likely since TM had a cotton tee shirt on which would have caught the blood long enough for the position changes described.
1. Witness says TM was on top just prior to shot.
2. Expert forensic witness says condition of tee shirt indicates TM was on top.
No evidence was presented that contradicts those two pieces of testimony.
Psst. We are already at mob rule!
There is NOT so much that is unknown. That’s an absurd statement.
Come the revolution.
Shouldn't be all that much longer...
And that he looks like Obama’s “son”.
Leave me out of this!
It will mean the jury is tainted.
Nifongism should be prosecuted.
Unless your goal is an emotion driven verdict, facts be damned.
I have to turn off the TV when the shows go New Yarker, especially Hannity... I do not understand the need to scream and over talk on a program but I guess that is the New York way and one of the reasons we don’t want them in Texas...
You've been watching too much CSI crap on television.
Zimmerman didn't have a scriptwriter to create the "evidence".
The most important point was “He didn’t have to have one scratch”...
Most gunshot wounds do not bleed immediately. It takes a few seconds for the blood to flow from and injury. Have you ever cut yourself deeply? There is a good 5 to 10 seconds before the cut begins to bleed. Gunshots to the chest even more so because the chest cavity has to fill with blood before the it is forced from the bullet hole.
When Ronald Reagan was shot he did not bleed extrnally at all for several minutes. So your assumption of blood on George is wrong. Due to two sweat shirts being worn there would not even be blood splatter from the initial impact.
“They might have burned that bridge of civil suite vs Zimmerman by suing and accepting a settlement from the HOA.”
That just may be one. Some of these plaintiff’s attorneys can be very creative in trying to name a defendant in a case no matter how tangentially connected.
I am sure that there are attorneys here on FR who can expound on this better than I can.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.