Posted on 07/13/2013 7:14:17 PM PDT by JT Hatter
http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/zimmerman-trial-verdict-watch-live/
Sorry, click the about IFAMM link. They are just an off shoot of the Masons with no affiliation.
Ha,ha. Not a chance.
Instead Dems will (if) do their best to organize and protest to show the opposite, that a verdict like this shows that this is still the 1960s South and so there is a free license for white Tea Party folks to till blacks.
That is to win elections to pass federal laws to make it tough to beat Dems in non-blue states.
Al Sharpton will be organizing peaceful protests for this purpose.
We can only dream of mass riot and killings by Obama blacks now. It would cripple their side. Make my day.
Not sure if this is relevant, but I went to check out DU/Kos. The blacks there are clearly calling for a race war, but they’re being chastised by the white libs. Seems the white libs don’t want to make their last stand on Trayvon Hill whereas the blacks are totally willing.
Get your popcorn ready folks.
bump
Just got back from the second dumpster fire of the night. Somewhere, some hood-rats are wandering around town screaming “this trash is for Trayvon!”
3 DUmmies have decided to boycott Florida apparently.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023252172
Why the not guilty verdict-—IMHO:
(1) Rachel Jeantel. Couldn’t read.... testified she “heard the grass.”
(2) Defense summation——dead silence for the four minutes Trayvon could have left the area but didn’t.....surely an indication he was up to no good.
Hooray!
Haven’t read through to the end...did anyone post to you that no federal civil rights trial is possible? Private citizens cannot be tried on charges of violating someone’s civil rights. Yes, that’s right. Those statutes are not applicable to private citizens but to public officials at various levels.
In the state of FL, if you are found not guilty of a crime, the aggrieved are not allowed to still file a civil suit against you.
So no, and no.
Not happening.
Thank God.
Everyone who said how women will decide based on emotion and all that, owes these women jurors an apology...
...why? Ample precedent suggested that females view situations differently than males, and that compromise and conciliation guide their actions...in this particular case, the facts were such that compromise wasn’t even an option...deliberations should have taken all of five minutes...
Zimmerman’s brother looks White and George looks Spanish.
“When do we stop judging by skin color?”
What’s this “we,” kemosabe? Only Democrats see everything through the fractured prism of race.
“Yes, everyone who speculated that an all woman jury was bad news, owes all of these women an apology. Everyone who said how women will decide based on emotion and all that, owes these women jurors an apology.”
I was one of them. And I do most humbly offer this jury an apology. And a debt of gratitude.
Only if those who said an all woman jury would never deliver a “ Not Guilty” verdict eat the crow first!...
...sorry...not going to be frying any birds for dinner...this case was so open and shut it was quite an easy decision for them...I’ll withhold judgment on entirely females juries until some more difficult case crops up...
“Unbelievable”
Not at all it was expected,they thought the “fix” was in and are shell shocked,F’em.
The threat of riot was always an attempt to influence the verdict. Now that there is a verdict, the threat to riot is useless.
“Can those of us who predicted acquittal crow about it?”
You sure can. Although I thought acquittal was a no-brainer, I was sure that this jury would have “split the baby” and found him guilty of manslaughter. I owe the jury an apology, and I happily give it.
“Only if those who said an all woman jury would never deliver a ‘Not Guilty’ verdict eat the crow first!”
I did say I did not think THIS all-woman jury would acquit him, and that I thought they’d return with a manslaughter conviction. I am happy to be proved wrong, and I apologize to this jury for thinking they’d succumb to political pressure.
That being said, women DO tend to apply more emotion to their jury deliberations than men. Especially in civil trials where someone has been injured or damaged and is suing for money to “be made whole” again. I see that on a daily basis. But this was a criminal trial, and awarding money was not the object, but rather a man’s freedom was. I applaud this jury.
I’ve already issued my apoloigy, many times over. And I was happy to do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.