[yoe]

Why would anyone submit to the humiliating spectacle of the Weiner's public demise .....The Muslim Brotherhood needs more help on the inside.....running for Mayor at gun point?

[duckman]

Rats and media don’t want any ‘spill over’ on to Hillary and her run in 2016.IMO

[PLD]

I am glad this is finally getting out there..some of us here have reported this for a long time..Now FOX news lets see you report this..We know the Communist media won’t..

[chris37]

Because her husband supports LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights for women and stands up for the poor and blah, blah, blah...

They could both eat babies in their cereal for breakfast and everything would be fine, because nothing matters but the agenda.

[skeeter]

I can only imagine what radical islam will do to her husband when he’s outlived his usefulness.

[353FMG]

>Why won’t the media cover Huma Abedin’s ties to the global jihad movement?<

.
Ever thought of the possibility that the MSM is already infiltrated by the jihadis?

Remember, for instance, that Fux News is partly owned by the Saudis.

[sport]

Because the media and Huma are on the same side. A better question would be, why was Huma removed from being The muslim brotherhood and Saudis’ spy on Hillary and from being Hillary’s girltoy to being assigned to Weiner, her alleged husband.

[Colonel_Flagg]

Michele Bachmann was right again.

[Standing Wolf]

Isn't the Abedin-Clinton national security story at least as newsworthy as Weiner's private parts?

Apparently not.

The failed main stream "news" media use a simple litmus test to determine whether any given story is so-called "newsworthy:" is it helpful or harmful to the leftist extremist oligarchy that rules in place of our lost constitutional republic and several states?

[opentalk]

The Huma Unmentionables by Andrew C. McCarthy

[Steve_Seattle]

Back when Michele Bachmann was raising questions about Abedin, my local paper ran an op-ed - written by my brother-in-law - denouncing her as a McCarthyite and asking “Have you no shame?”

[SoFloFreeper]

You're joking, right? You really don't know why?

[boatbums]

The Atlantic Wire has a recent article that starts by saying:

When Michele Bachmann picked on Huma Abedin a year ago — claiming she had some convoluted connection to the Muslim Brotherhood — there was a rush to defend the longtime Hillary Clinton aide.

It amazes me all the time - though by now it shouldn't - how the Liberal media really don't have a clue about the truth.

[JoeProBono]

[maggief]

Shoebat: How is Huma Abedin connected to Egypt’s new President? (Morsi)

http://shoebat.com/2012/06/24/how-is-huma-abedin-connected-to-egypts-new-president/

Libyan Documents: Egyptians – Including Dr. Morsi – Linked to Benghazi Attacks

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/libyan-documents-egyptians-including-dr-morsi-linked-to-benghazi-attacks/

[Chode]

for the same reason they don't cover any other RAT crimes... RATS is as RATS does

[fishtank]

[American in Israel]

Why won't the media cover Huma Abedin's ties to the global jihad movement? <\I>

Because Saudi Arabia has controlling interest in most of Americas Media Conglomeration. Including Fox News.

[Diogenesis]

No surprise.

THE MSM hates the American people and the US Constitution.

They love all enemies of the American people.

[MasterGunner01]

“Why won't the media cover Huma Abedin’s ties to the global jihad movement?”

Because the mainstream media is allied with the jihadists in destroying Western Civilization?

[I want the USA back]

Because they suddenly realized that they could see a female member of the religion of peace running for president. Then they could start chanting the mantra “first religion of peace woman president”

The country is in deep $h!t.