NOTHING you responded with supports your position. This is just your latest attempt to deceive people into believing you've "proven" something.
I've read what you've had to say far too many times. You ALWAYS claim that you PROVED something when you didn't. You are the master of the non sequitur, the ad nauseum, and the false equivalency.
You conflate birth on soil to "born a citizen" and you conflate "born a citizen" to "natural born citizen." You incrementally slither from one dubious conclusion to the next and then declare the beginning and the ending to be exactly alike.
Now it has been demonstrated to you that a person born on American soil does not automatically become a citizen, that the person's FATHER is the determining factor, and what do you do? You attempt to pretend that this is an irrelevant point when it is the VERY HEART OF THE ISSUE.
The quote from Thomas F Bayard demonstrates that your claim is FALSE. Birth on the soil does NOT EQUAL citizenship, yet you are going to continue making this claim, and you are going to continue asserting that "ALL AUTHORITIES SUPPORT ME!" Even though this has been clearly disproved so many times it's no longer funny.
You don't need an apology, you need mental help.
My personal favorite:
'Subject, or citizen' is two ways to say the same thing, but 'native, or natural born' always means two separate things.
Huh?
I went to school when they still taught grammer... you know.... 'the fuctions of conjuctions' ties two things together.
There sure is a lot of unnecessary hoopla going around about those “anchor babies” if that statement is true.