Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/355827/good-sense-voter-id-editors
To: National Review
Real voters are disenfranchised by voter fraud, so right back at you, Hillary and NAACP crooks.
2 posted on
08/15/2013 7:26:55 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: National Review
Well, I guess the argument can be made that you can "disenfranchise" multiple/fraud/illegal voting. Maybe this is what the barbarians mean?
3 posted on
08/15/2013 7:27:29 AM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: National Review; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Tennessee Nana; Liz; TADSLOS; ...
RE :”
But the photo-ID requirement is important, too, inasmuch as it is a worthwhile thing to be able to ensure that people showing up to vote are who they say they are. Guerrilla filmmaker James OKeefe famously talked a District of Columbia voting clerk into giving him a ballot for one Eric Holder. As our John Fund has doggedly documented, the voting fraud that Democrats claim is so rare as to be practically exotic in fact happens all the time. Examples abound: A Democratic election volunteer during the hotly contested 2012 Ohio election voted twice. Al Franken very likely sits in the U.S. Senate as the result of votes cast by more than 1,000 ineligible Minnesota voters: In an election decided by 312 votes, 177 people already have been convicted not just charged, but convicted of fraud in that election. In Pennsylvania, election engineers were filmed coming out of a prison with boxes of ballots (it is illegal for incarcerated felons to vote in the state). Other examples abound.” If you listen to libs they claim there is no more than one or two cases of the above in the history of the US.
They Claim voter fraud doesnt exist.
Why? Few convictions.
5 posted on
08/15/2013 7:36:11 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
To: National Review
My valid vote is cancelled when a fraudulent vote is cast for an opposing candidate/referendum.
Thus, I am disenfranchised when voter qualification is not properly vetted.
6 posted on
08/15/2013 7:43:22 AM PDT by
kidd
To: National Review
Democrat logic
Honesty = disenfranchisement
7 posted on
08/15/2013 9:02:10 AM PDT by
Vaduz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson