[generally]

If the facts support your theory, you’re not a nut. If someone called you a kangaroo, that wouldn’t make you one.

Yes, it’s aggravating to be called a conspiracy nut. Mocking us is a great technique to shut us up.

I’m a birther and not afraid to say so. Same with JFK. I don’t claim to know the answers, but I point out the flaws in the stories that are foisted on us by the complicit media. (I have no idea where Zippy was born. I’m not claiming Kenya, but I am claiming that we have not seen a real BC. The fact that he promoted himself as an author with a bio saying he was born in Kenya certainly raises some interesting questions, such as Was he lying then or is he lying now?)

With JFK, I haven’t spent a great deal of time reading about it, but the evidence I’ve seen makes a strong case for LBJ being behind it or at least a part of it. If LBJ gave the go-ahead, that doesn’t rule out other players who may have been in on it or contributed.

Imagine if Zippy were assassinated, who might have an interest in that. I’m sure that the MSM would immediately point the finger at anyone and everyone on the right. Tea Partiers would likely be at the top of the list. But who would have the most to gain? The left. They’d get a martyr/hero, clear the way for the next puppet in line, rid themselves of an embarrassment, and have yet another stick to use against the *racists* and *haters* on the right. They’d also use the event to further invade our privacy and take away freedoms, particularly 2A rights. Even if he wasn’t shot, they’d manage to work that angle. Foreign foes might also have an interest in Zippy’s demise for a wide variety of reasons. Personally, I don’t want him dead. I want to see him in jail - for life - after his many serious crimes are fully exposed.

[k4gypsyrose]

I listened to all the theories about JFK and simply asked myself, “Who had the most to gain from his death?” I kept coming back to LBJ. Of course I can’t prove it, but I believe that LBJ was involved somehow and it was because he wanted us to play a bigger role in Vietnam. JMHO.

[Uncle Sham]

I've done extensive reading on this subject over the last twenty years. The primary crime that has been committed has been the coverup. Many people who might have had knowledge harmful to the official government "Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone" account ended up dead. Study this aspect by itself and it tells you that your government has been lying about this event from the start. I truly believe that Oswald was C.I.A., following orders that were meant to set him up as a patsy, then killed to shut him up and prevent any sort of court proceedings from uncovering evidence. I don't think he fired a shot.

Everything I've read, which includes almost every theory, points to L.B.J., along with J. Edgar Hoover, the C.I.A., and organized crime as the three primary suspects. They had the ability, the motive, and the power after the fact to cover things up and eliminate "problems". That power structure is still in place after all of these years and has owned every President since the assassination with the exception of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Remember, they tried getting rid of Reagan one month into his first term so their protection man, George Bush, could be in charge.

You cannot mess with these people. If they can kill your President in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, they can kill anyone.