How Oberlin Created the Hate Crime of the Year

Busted. Stone-cold busted. Just as I suspected, “progressive” pranksters at Oberlin College have been definitively unmasked as the perpetrators of phony campus “hate crimes” that scored international headlines in March. The blabbermouth academic administrators who helped fuel the hysteria are now running for cover.

The Associated Press, the New York Times, MSNBC, Yahoo News, and the Huffington Post were among the media outlets that trumpeted the story of supposed racism, homophobia, and anti-Semitism run amok at my alma mater. Throughout the winter, anti-black and anti-gay graffiti, swastikas, and a shadowy figure in a “KKK hood” surfaced on the tiny campus outside Cleveland, Ohio. Black Entertainment Television News decried the hate outbreaks and a “KKK sighting.”

Because of my firsthand knowledge of Oberlin’s long history of self-manufactured hate-crime incidents, the fake-hate-crime alarm bells went off immediately for me when I read the reports. Back in the 1990s, race-obsessed nutballs at Oberlin College cooked up a horrid hate-crime hoax. Asian-American students claimed that a phantom racist had spray-painted anti-Asian racial epithets on a campus landmark rock. It turned out that it was a warped Asian-American student who perpetrated the dirty deed.

Student newspapers were filled with complaints about imaginary racism. One Asian-American student accused a library worker of racism after the poor staffer asked the grievance-mongering student to lower the blinds where she was studying. A black student accused an ice-cream-shop owner of racism after he told the student she was not allowed to sit at an outside table because she hadn’t purchased any items from his store.

My suspicions about the latest “hate” crime were bolstered by police statements that the “KKK hood”–wearing menace was actually a female student wrapped in a blanket. Hollywood darling and Oberlin alumna Lena Dunham was undaunted, however, in ginning up emotional calls for Obie solidarity on Twitter, which the AP dutifully reported as “news.” My warnings and reports on previous Obie hoaxes, alas, were not deemed AP-newsworthy.

The orgy of self-flagellation swelled. Liberal grievance-mongers applauded the administration’s decision to shut down classes. Faculty, students, and opportunists took to the airwaves and the Internet to bemoan “white privilege,” institutional bigotry, lack of diversity, yada, yada, yada.

And now, the rest of the story. According to police reports published by Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller News Foundation this week, two students had fessed up to most of the incidents (and fellow students suspect they are responsible for all of them). The Oberlin Police Department identified the hoaxers as Dylan Bleier (a student worker bee for President Obama’s Organizing for Action and a member of the Oberlin College Democrats) and Matthew Alden. Bleier told police the pair posted inflammatory signs and a Nazi flag around campus to “joke” with and “troll” their peers.

Investigators “caught them red-handed” trying to circulate anti-Muslim fliers, and a search of Bleier’s e-mail confirmed he had used a fake account to harass a female student. Cops told Oberlin president Marvin Krislov, but he failed to pursue any criminal action. The two students were removed from campus before the bogus “KKK” brouhaha and news-making shutdown.

Krislov not only remained silent about the two pranksters, but he also stoked the fires of political correctness and helped fuel the false notion that real bigotry had pervaded the campus. The spring edition of the Oberlin College alumni magazine opened with a self-congratulatory essay from Krislov titled “A Fitting Response.”

After perversely bragging about the “national and international news” headlines on the “bias incidents [that] disrupted our campus community,” Krislov clucked that “similar things have occurred at other colleges.” Which, of course, is inadvertently true. As I’ve reported for 20 years, American college campuses are the most fertile grounds for fake hate.

Krislov then praised “students, faculty, staff, alumni and fellow Oberlin residents” who “turned hate into an opportunity to educate.” Of course, “hate” had nothing to do with it. And the police reports suggest that Krislov knew it. The rash of “intolerance” that littered the Oberlin campus was a symptom of juvenile delinquency and perverse self-delusion. Instead of examining his guilt in coddling hate-crime hoaxers, Krislov giddily promoted new efforts devoted to “strengthening the emphasis on diversity.”

There are other adults who deserve to be called out. As Cornell law professor and blogger William Jacobson, who has pressed the administration for months about the cover-up, notes: “Oberlin continues the wall of silence which delayed for months disclosure of the hoax. It’s time for Oberlin to reveal who knew what, and when, particularly as to the oversight exercised by the Board of Trustees.”

Sad to say, this is the sorry state of liberal-arts colleges in America today: Extreme identity politics, multiculturalism, and pedagogical self-indulgence are creating a generation of race trolls enabled by tenured cultural-Marxist punks raking in beaucoup bucks. The bursting of the higher-ed bubble can’t come fast enough.

It is within the interests and agenda of people on the left to imagine and foster a climate of hate and bigotry the better to delude other leftist/liberal saps. This keeps the money flowing to the various lefty anti-hate groups and allows them to spread the lie about all the nasty, racist bigoted things that are done to them and their fellow libs by conservatives. Foreign lefties lap this stuff as well eagerly accepting the myth of oppressed minorities suffering from vicious haters. Of course, all the haters are conservatives.

The fact that 99% of these "hate crimes" turns out to be hoaxes does not dim their desire to continue inventing stories. We'll see another fake hate crime next year at some college campus. And the media and other libs will eagerly swallow that one like they did this one and all the other hoaxes that preceded it. Libs truly can't help themselves. I think their capacity for self-delusion is genetic.

Actually, in this case, the law should utterly disregard any notion that what they did were “pranks”, and instead prosecute them to the full extent of the law for “hate crimes”.

While I agree that the very idea of “hate crimes” is ludicrous as criminal acts, what is downright offensive, and a menace to “equality before the law” is that such “hate crimes” are *selectively* prosecuted.

Proclaiming that there is a law that only some people can violate, based on their race, religion, gender, etc., but that other people *are exempt from prosecution*, because of their race, religion, gender, etc. *even though it is exactly the same act*, is REPUGNANT to our system of laws.

That is, while the idea of “hate crimes” is repulsive; the idea of selective enforcement of the law goes against our entire system of justice. It threatens the very basis for the law in our nation.

Judges may go to lengths to try to rationalize “hate crime” laws; but they cannot justify selective enforcement, because this means that they, judges, have no purpose. They might as well quit, because otherwise they are just puppets and bureaucrats.

Imagine the opposite to “hate crimes”, a law that applies only to black people. White people are exempt from this law. Only black people can be sent to prison for it.

Of course the idea is offensive to the constitution. But this offense must work both ways.

These students have committed “hate crimes”, by the letter of the law. They are not exempt from prosecution and punishment.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.