Posted on 08/27/2013 2:03:35 PM PDT by NYer
For now, in the honeymoon period, it's less biased than CNN?
Just a guess. I won't watch either one.
Not satisfied that the domestically based media outlets were not sufficiently destructive of our values and customs, comes now the muslim owned Al Jazeera. (THANK YOU ALGORE!)
At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic giant to step the ocean and crush us at one blow Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years.
At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
Abraham Lincoln, 1837
I WATCH IT JUST TO LOOK AT THE GOOD LOOKING MUSLIM TV NEWS CHICKS WITH THE SOUND OFF.
What brains??
Make a snappy motto. I wonder if James Earl Jones is available to do the voice over.
I thought fridagitis was a microbial infection.
How can you tell she is good looking?
Thanks NYer.
Easy, Al Jazeera is more honest.
I watched AJ English when we had it on Roku, and it had very good coverage of world news. It was much better than the US networks. Of course they are biased, duh, but you just keep that in mind while watching. They had great coverage of the unrest in Egypt and the fighting in Syria.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.