Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/30/2013 11:24:52 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

He is manufacturing all the evidence he needs as I write.


2 posted on 08/30/2013 11:29:08 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the people. T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

seems all we need to do it get 1 corpse that was in the attack.
Seems the “ahem” “rebels” should be able to to that.


3 posted on 08/30/2013 11:30:25 AM PDT by stylin19a (Obama -> Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The Dems better have concrete evidence. They were the a-holes who turned Bush’s mistake about Iraqi WMD’ stockpiles into “Bush lied.”


6 posted on 08/30/2013 11:34:25 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

How does the United States benefit if we “WIN?”


7 posted on 08/30/2013 11:35:35 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

He doesn’t need any “goods” to justify any of his actions.

Who is going to protest? Good men in Congress? There ain’t any. The GOP? The MSM?

You need not have any “goods” if you have a blank and signed check in your pocket.


9 posted on 08/30/2013 11:38:03 AM PDT by 353FMG ( I do not say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“There is an international treaty banning the use of chemical weapons against civilians....” And I’m pretty sure that treaty only applies to the use of chemical weapons against the civilians of another soveriegn state. What you do to your own civilians is, and always has been, your business.


10 posted on 08/30/2013 11:38:29 AM PDT by henkster (If the Feds create an unlimited demand for bastard children, you get an unlimited supply of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Another matter to clear up: who are “civilians”, vs. who are ununiformed combatants?


11 posted on 08/30/2013 11:40:06 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Obama Better Have the Goods on Syria

Why, is New York Magazine going to demand Impeachment on it's cover if he doesn't?

Thought not.

12 posted on 08/30/2013 11:40:06 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Yellow cake comes to mind every time this aspect of the mess is discussed.


13 posted on 08/30/2013 11:40:56 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Syria has promised that if they are attacked by the U.S. they will bomb Israel.

I wonder how all the Jewish democrats who voted for Baraq TWICE are feeling about now?

18 posted on 08/30/2013 11:46:02 AM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Colin Powell was a much more convincing liar.


19 posted on 08/30/2013 11:48:28 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Whether or not Obama “has the goods on Syria” does not matter a whit. The President of the United States has no right to declare war. If the President goes to war without Congressional approval, and it is not a national emergency, that President should be subject to impeachment, removal from office, and incarceration. Such an act may rise to treason, and there is a document somewhere that spells out the punishment for that crime.


20 posted on 08/30/2013 11:48:34 AM PDT by thesharkboy (posting without reading the article since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Our new Syrian MISADVENTURE is a DIVERSION from all the domestic scandals besetting this gang of criminals.

Hey, all you stupid low and no information voters. Don’t look there. Look at this shiny thing over HERE!


22 posted on 08/30/2013 11:48:58 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I’m predisposed to favor a punitive air strike against Syria for its apparent use of chemical weapons against civilians.

So, the prevailing attitude is tha killing 100,000+ civilians with bombs and bullets is acceptable but killing 1,000+ with gas is not? Right?

Isn't it true that dead is dead in either case?

26 posted on 08/30/2013 11:57:03 AM PDT by varon ( cum tyrannis para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Regarding the backlash, before this is over we may well see America's home land hit again due to obozo attacking Syria. All things considered, who's to say provoking an attack on America isn't part of the obozo’s plan to further damage the US? My sense is that the Chinese and Russian threats of retaliation had much to do with Britain folding.
30 posted on 08/30/2013 12:00:01 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

In our progressive media circus world does it even matter if he has the goods?

Hussein killed over a million, not just 1,400 and the vicious vermin still go after us for Iraq.

So, by their logic, lets wait until 2 million are killed by any means.

Actually, I would prefer if we just wait until they annihilate each other then problem solved. A Syria without any Muslims would be a much better Syria.


32 posted on 08/30/2013 12:59:09 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam! 969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

who says it was going to be a Massacre in Libya? Ghadafi was going to attack in Benghazi which was a Hot bed Of Alqueda which we found out,to clean out the Al queda Bunch and for that Obama killed him


34 posted on 08/31/2013 5:45:07 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson