He is manufacturing all the evidence he needs as I write.
seems all we need to do it get 1 corpse that was in the attack.
Seems the “ahem” “rebels” should be able to to that.
The Dems better have concrete evidence. They were the a-holes who turned Bush’s mistake about Iraqi WMD’ stockpiles into “Bush lied.”
How does the United States benefit if we “WIN?”
He doesn’t need any “goods” to justify any of his actions.
Who is going to protest? Good men in Congress? There ain’t any. The GOP? The MSM?
You need not have any “goods” if you have a blank and signed check in your pocket.
“There is an international treaty banning the use of chemical weapons against civilians....” And I’m pretty sure that treaty only applies to the use of chemical weapons against the civilians of another soveriegn state. What you do to your own civilians is, and always has been, your business.
Another matter to clear up: who are “civilians”, vs. who are ununiformed combatants?
Why, is New York Magazine going to demand Impeachment on it's cover if he doesn't?
Thought not.
Yellow cake comes to mind every time this aspect of the mess is discussed.
I wonder how all the Jewish democrats who voted for Baraq TWICE are feeling about now?
Colin Powell was a much more convincing liar.
Whether or not Obama “has the goods on Syria” does not matter a whit. The President of the United States has no right to declare war. If the President goes to war without Congressional approval, and it is not a national emergency, that President should be subject to impeachment, removal from office, and incarceration. Such an act may rise to treason, and there is a document somewhere that spells out the punishment for that crime.
Our new Syrian MISADVENTURE is a DIVERSION from all the domestic scandals besetting this gang of criminals.
Hey, all you stupid low and no information voters. Don’t look there. Look at this shiny thing over HERE!
So, the prevailing attitude is tha killing 100,000+ civilians with bombs and bullets is acceptable but killing 1,000+ with gas is not? Right?
Isn't it true that dead is dead in either case?
In our progressive media circus world does it even matter if he has the goods?
Hussein killed over a million, not just 1,400 and the vicious vermin still go after us for Iraq.
So, by their logic, lets wait until 2 million are killed by any means.
Actually, I would prefer if we just wait until they annihilate each other then problem solved. A Syria without any Muslims would be a much better Syria.
who says it was going to be a Massacre in Libya? Ghadafi was going to attack in Benghazi which was a Hot bed Of Alqueda which we found out,to clean out the Al queda Bunch and for that Obama killed him