Posted on 09/04/2013 6:43:41 AM PDT by markomalley
The two major parties in America agree on virtually nothing. From abortion and gay marriage to tax rates and regulation, Democrats and Republicans hold polar viewpoints. But somehow, when it comes to the expansion of government power without regard for American interest, bipartisanship somehow springs to the fore.
How else to explain agreement between Republicans and Democrats on potential war in Syria?
This week, House Speaker John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Whip Eric Cantor and President Obama all agreed that military action was absolutely necessary in Syria. The rationales varied from the absurd to the unsupportable.
First, this coalition of the willing argued that America's credibility was at risk thanks to President Obama's statement in May 2012 that chemical weapons use in Syria would provide a "red line," provoking a "game changer" of a response. This makes no sense, given the fact that President Obama has refused to draw a red line with regard to Syria's sponsor state, Iran, and its pursuit of nuclear weapons; the fact that Obama's administration leaked Israeli national security secrets that would have allowed Israel to strike Iran's nuclear facilities; and the fact that Obama did nothing to help the Iranian opposition when it revolted against the mullahs in 2009. Iran knows that America has no credibility under Obama. So does everyone else.
Second, the bipartisan consensus argued that America had to get involved in Syria to protect American allies. But the Obama administration has already pressured Israel to make concessions to Palestinian terrorists, thrown its Egyptian ally Hosni Mubarak under the bus in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood, and allowed its Tunisian ally Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to fall in favor of the Islamist Ennahda Party. The Obama administration clearly has no interest in supporting its Middle Eastern allies. As for Israel, Israel has a far better chance of being dragged into a Syria conflict if the United States takes middling action than if the United States takes no action. And as President Obama has said, truly harsh action is off the table.
Third, the Syria war caucus argued that Assad's alleged use of chemical weapons had to merit a response. As Nancy Pelosi put it, the red line was not Obama's but humanity's. But the red line itself made no sense -- did it make a difference to the Syrian rebels shot in the head whether they ended up with a bullet to the brain or sarin gas? Certainly it didn't matter much to the Jews of Babi Yar during the Holocaust that they were mowed down by machine guns rather than gassed to death in crematoria.
So, then, what's the real excuse for the bipartisan agreement about action in Syria? The answer lies in Republican blindness. Democrats support Obama's wars because Obama is president. Republicans support the Syrian conflict out of the blind belief that Obama will use authority granted him to magically transform into George W. Bush -- a president who at least had an entry plan, if not an exit plan. Since the end of the Cold War, Republicans have apparently never met a military action they didn't support (see Somalia, Sudan, Yugoslavia); Democrats only support wars in full-throated fashion when those wars are waged by Democrats. Nowhere in any of this do American interests come into play.
There’s a shock!
Bunch of spelunkers.
I already told my Congressman. Vote no or look for another job in 2014. It’s pointless to threaten my Senators any more, I’m just not going to vote for them (in Isakson’s case or the GOP pick for Chambliss’ replacement in the other).
As for my Congressman, if he votes for it, I’ll drop $10K to his challenger next time.
Then hold the damn vote already! Let’s see how many RATS are on board.
OR - an alternative explanation is that the congress is a congress for show and when it comes to “things that matter” they vote how they’re told to vote.
They are uniting America.
The Tea Party and Code Pink will be holding a joint pitchfork protest on the National Mall if this happens.
The Pubs are treating this like any other legislative battle. You give me a little something and I’ll give you...
Was there any doubt? These Clowns need to be removed, especially the leadership. Last time we took the House we should have put some young fire brands in leadership. I hope we get the chance in 2014.
Totally expected.
Puhleze.
The GOP and DNC are identical.
RomneyCARE = ObamaCARE? They were CREATED
by Romney the Republican coward-rat.
gay marriage? It was first IMPOSED by Romney the Republican coward-rat.
Avoiding festering corruption (eg. Benghazi)?
They are the same. Identical.
So far, the Republicans, led by al-McCain and al-Graham,
have LED the charge, with Obomber, to help al Qaeda.
I hope Boehner, his second, and all those under him in the power structure get eviscerated in 2014. I want their figurative guts spilled on the election night dais and to see the agonized look on their faces.
Or, if by some miracle it actually improves the situation, Obama will take all the credit.
Screw 'em. Get it over with. If this is so all-fired necessary, hold the damn vote so McCain can get back to playing online Solitaire.
Boner is going to tell us that we have to to pick and and choose our battles. I’m still waiting for him to pick one.....
The republicans, desperate for approval from liberal voters, taking conservatives for granted, will be so embarassed when moderates along with conservatives, flock to any politician taking up the wise position of advocating for Americans’ true interests.
These lukewarm hypocrites will be rejected
Really????
If the Republicans that control the party are truly Republicans (or truly interested in a political move that makes sense) they would oppose it and adopt the populist mantra of "Don't drag us into another war in the middle east".
They are truly either corrupt or stupid beyond belief because this this mantra has been blasted into the ears and eyes of the American public for well over a decade now and will find a receptive audience. Idiots.
The first sentence is a lie. in 2012, they have agreed on virtually everything. We had tax increases, immigration, internet taxes, judge and appointment approvals without any problems. The GOP is rolling over for the Democrat positions. Most even want to let Obamacare be implemented without questioning or withholding funds.
...proving beyond any reasonable doubt that this is a really, really bad idea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.