To: Oldeconomybuyer
What is it he’s seeking? 0bama is seeking shelter for the next 3 years from several scandals that threaten to bring him down. Imagine launching a few cruise missiles into Syria which begets a retaliatory response from Iran. So the next 3 years we will be at war with the ayatollahs to divert attention away from the illegal alien in the White House as well as all of his illegal and unconstitutional acts.
2 posted on
09/06/2013 4:59:11 AM PDT by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I cant answer that, what were seeking.
Is this a bad script or are these words from the leaders of the free world?
3 posted on
09/06/2013 4:59:17 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
4 posted on
09/06/2013 4:59:26 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let the potus get in one of those circus cannons and we can fire him across a bow somewhere.
5 posted on
09/06/2013 5:01:32 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(To stay calm during these tumultuous times, I take Damitol. Ask your Doctor if it's right for you.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I can’t tell you - in other words trust us. Um, that’ll be no. Not a chance in h#ll, not with the BS we’ve seen continually coming out of this administration.
6 posted on
09/06/2013 5:02:32 AM PDT by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Economy sucks, too many scandals in the administration, start a war.
7 posted on
09/06/2013 5:04:28 AM PDT by
MulberryDraw
(That which cannot be paid, won't be paid.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Evil droolers and belly button gazers.
9 posted on
09/06/2013 5:13:11 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
11 posted on
09/06/2013 5:16:52 AM PDT by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
They harass us for answers, votes and money but we cannot bother them with explanation of objectives?
Gotcha, the only objective is tyranny then.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Frankly, I would prefer an unserious shot across the bow to a serious war. Doesn’t Charles realize by now that serious wars have serious consequences? Can the War Party at least wait until we enounter an actual threat to our national security before launching the next serious war?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This year alone, Israel has four times conducted airstrikes in Syria. No Syrian response. How did Israel get away with it? Israel had announced that it would not tolerate Assad acquiring or transferring to Hezbollah advanced weaponry. No grandiloquent speeches by the Israeli foreign minister. No leaked target lists. Indeed, the Israelis didnt acknowledge the strikes even after they had carried them out. Unlike the American president, they have no interest in basking in perceived toughness. They care only about effect. They care about just one audience the party to be deterred, namely Assad and his allies. Assad knows who did it. He didnt have to see the Israeli prime minister preening about it on world television.
This really says it all. You can't take the community organizer out of him. It's like a stench that won't go away.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This time, Chris Matthews nailed it-it’s all about “saving Obama’s hide.” Is it worth American assets and American blood to help Obama save face? Only to Chris Matthews.
23 posted on
09/06/2013 7:01:43 AM PDT by
Spok
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Unless Obama can show the country that his dont-mock-me airstrike is, in fact, part of a serious strategic plan, Congress should vote no. I don't care what his strategic plan is, Congress should still vote no. Bombing Syria is not in this country's best interest.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
27 posted on
09/06/2013 9:54:07 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Strange times are these in which we live..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson