Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain adviser regrets starting Sarah Palin 'freak show' (FUJM)
Washington Examiner ^ | 9/27/2013 | By Washington Examiner staff reports

Posted on 09/27/2013 2:05:36 AM PDT by markomalley

The political operative who brought former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin onto the national political stage as Sen. John McCain's 2008 vice presidential running mate now says he has “deep regret” about doing creating the “freak show that's been running wild for four years” in the Republican Party.

Steve Schmidt was running McCain's presidential race when he helped convince the GOP nominee that bringing in a fresh, conservative face like Palin would be a game changer in a race being dominated by Democrat Barack Obama. The results proved disastrous for McCain.

Palin became a leader of what Schmidt called an “asininity” wing of the Republican Party, hardcore conservatives looking to purge the party of moderates and anyone willing to compromise with Democrats.

“For the last couple of years, we’ve had this wing of the party running roughshod over the rest of the party,” Schmidt said on MSNBC. “Tossing out terms like RINO, saying we’re going to purge, you know, the moderates out of the party.

“We’ve lost five U.S. Senate seats over the last two election cycles,” he said. “And fundamentally we need Republicans, whether they’re running for president, whether they’re in the leadership of the Congress, to stand up against a lot of this asininity.”

 

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: collaborator; sellout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: markomalley

That’s weird, McCain credits Palin with the total turnaround of his campaign and jump in the polls.


101 posted on 09/27/2013 2:36:29 PM PDT by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Because of the complete betrayal of their boss & candidate, neither Schmidt or Nicole Wallace will EVER be hired by a Republican campaign again.

They have chosen to make their livings from the enemy. Both consulted on "Game Change" and both are "contributors" on MSNBC where they trash Republicans everyday.

102 posted on 09/27/2013 2:41:32 PM PDT by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Because of the complete betrayal of their boss & candidate, neither Schmidt or Nicole Wallace will EVER be hired by a Republican campaign again.

Put another way, I would be extremely suspect of any "Republican" who hired either of those two scumbags.

FRegards,
LH

103 posted on 09/27/2013 4:18:09 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Is this Steve Schmidt Again?

That Evil Bastard needs to be drowned in Ammonia!

104 posted on 09/27/2013 4:20:30 PM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Deb

By the way, did you see this thread? VERY interesting:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3071509/posts


105 posted on 09/27/2013 4:30:55 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Progov

The collectivist Pubbies and the collectivist Dems are not going to allow an anti-collectivist run.


106 posted on 09/27/2013 8:18:43 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Progov

The collectivist Pubbies and the collectivist Dems are not going to allow an anti-collectivist to run.


107 posted on 09/27/2013 8:18:52 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

But they voted for him in AZ!


108 posted on 09/27/2013 8:19:20 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Deb

He was for it before he was against it.


109 posted on 09/27/2013 8:20:45 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

These people make me angry, but really I should pity and pray for them because Steve is not Sarah`s sister in Christ

Steve is NOT right with God


110 posted on 09/27/2013 8:38:43 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge ( Palin 2016 or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

brother in Christ I meant, but then again in Steve`s situation perhaps sister fits


111 posted on 09/27/2013 8:40:04 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge ( Palin 2016 or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Actually, in hindsight it was a mistake for Sarah Palin to be on the ticket in 2008. If she had been allowed to remain Alaska governor, she would have easily won a second term, and had built up an outstanding record on fiscal and energy policy, as well as government reform. And if she had spent a lot of time preparing herself for national issues (which she had not done), she would have walked away with the GOP nomination in 2012 and kicked Obama's ass in the election. She was the conservative Godsend we were hoping for.

Instead, she got thrust upon the national scene before she was entirely ready, and then the scumbag liberals exploited Alaska's ethics laws which require a public official to pay for their own legal defense bills, essentially forcing her from office (will also acknowledge that the large sums of money being thrown at her in conjunction with this helped make the decision to resign; doubt she would have resigned just on the money alone). Like Dan Quayle, unless she seeks lower political office to rehabilitate herself politically, she will never be a credible presidential candidate.

What a tragic loss for our nation.

112 posted on 09/27/2013 9:01:12 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
Like Dan Quayle, unless she seeks lower political office to rehabilitate herself politically, she will never be a credible presidential candidate.

What a tragic loss for our nation.


I was in agreement up to this point in your post. I can't get past the impression now that you are salting the thread.
113 posted on 09/27/2013 9:06:40 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. No Blood For Ego!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
What does "salting the thread" mean? Presuming that's a negative connotation, let me expound. If you're referring to Sarah Palin has been so thoroughly trashed by the media (and assisted by RINOS on our side) that it will be near impossible for anyone low information voter to be persuaded to support her at this point. However, if she were to become a U.S. Senator, she could build up a record of public service that could overcome the smearing.

If you're referring to Dan Quayle, Quayle was a very good U.S. Senator who, like Palin, was tapped on the shoulder too early. He made unfortunate gaffes that allowed him to be depicted as a dunce. From the V.P. chair, not a lot that can be done to overcome that. After leaving office, he could have easily become governor of Indiana or Arizona, but chose not to do that. When he ran for the nomination in 1996, he was considered a joke candidate.

Both need to re-build their political reputations to overcome (false) media narratives about them. Where am I wrong?

114 posted on 09/28/2013 4:45:16 AM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Totally right on!

“Ever notice how the only time Republican operatives and official can play “guts ball” is when attacking the democrats’ enemies?”


115 posted on 09/28/2013 4:49:18 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne

I totally disagree.

Palin may, or may not, run in 2016.

But she was not the problem. The GOP has (badly) handled both of the recent elections.

It seems to be she is tending toward staying with her kids in 2014.

However I think we might be seeing much more of Sarah Palin in 2016, and beyond.


116 posted on 09/28/2013 4:55:40 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I hope you’re right.


117 posted on 09/29/2013 10:33:09 AM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Ugh! Reagan might regret his 11th commandment if he had lived to see McCain.


118 posted on 10/01/2013 3:23:49 PM PDT by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson