Posted on 10/03/2013 1:57:09 PM PDT by robowombat
Readers should know that the original text of this post was typed by a Braille typewriter on a roll of Reynolds brand foil wrap.
At Oxford, Cambridge is known as “The Spy School” and also as “The Other Place”.
Heh!
Yes, parts of it seem to be recovered from a foilhat fashioned to defeat ELF control.
What part of the article gave that away? Was it where he said that "Jesus had survived the crucifixion, and that his descendants were none other than France’s original royal family, the Merovingians"? Or where he talks about "the interest the Catholic Church has in keeping this secret, and the involvement the Church has had historically with both the Mafia and with government intelligence agencies, including MI5 and MI6, especially via their “military arm,” the Knights of Malta"?
Oh the MI6/MI5 gay communist spy ring. Roger Hollis the 5th man?
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy meets DaVinci code. I prefer Tinker Tailor, but DaVinci code is a helluva read as well.
He had a history of belonging to secret societies, such as the Cambridge Apostles, and might have been a member of some rouge group within MI5 or the KGB that had an interest in this particular issue.
Yeah, this seems pretty silly.
Once Blunt was revealed to be a spy, he couldn’t enter a gay bar without being attacked. Which just shows you how “gay rights” have degenerated over the years. Today, he’d be a rebel hero.
I always thought Blunt was the 5th man. Hope all 5 (whoever they are) are rotting in hell.
And Oxford is universally known as “The home of lost causes”
Was that something to do with it being a hotbed of Jacobite sympathisers during the 18th century?
3) Stop filling the Executive Branch and SCOTUS with Ivy Leaguers.
Seems like I can’t countany more...
Sauniere was sued and disciplined by the Catholic Church for selling the dedication of masses to grief-stricken survivors using small ads in various publications in France, and Nicolas Fouquet's mysterious letter to his brother has been credibly explained as referring to ways to make and detect forgeries -- a matter of interest to both artists and officials and sovereigns who deal with with financial instruments.
As it was, Sauniere, a provincial priest, spun wild tales and gave cryptic explanations as to the source of his wealth in order to avoid admitting the truth: he was a crook who violated his sacred oath as a priest. And Nicolas Fouquet took bribes and stole massive sums from the French king, who eventually removed him from power and tried and imprisoned him.
Burgess was a raging homosexual with a clique of similar types in the media and British parliament example, look up Tom Driberg.
Unless one has a rudimentary knowledge of art history. Then the entire premise of the book falls apart.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.