Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anxiety as stimulus hike in food stamps set to end
Associated Press ^ | Oct 10, 2013 6:21 AM (ET) | RIK STEVENS

Posted on 10/10/2013 8:07:14 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) - A temporary increase in food stamps expires Oct. 31, meaning for millions of Americans, the benefits that help put food on the table won't stretch as far as they have for the past four years.

Food stamps - actually the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - go to 47 million Americans a month, almost half of them children and teenagers.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foodstamps; stimulus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: rurgan

.....If there are any jobs at all, period.


41 posted on 10/10/2013 8:36:38 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Maynard!


42 posted on 10/10/2013 8:36:57 AM PDT by glock rocks (Wasn't prohibition the "Law of the land?" Wasn't "the earth is flat" proven science? Charlatans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

The government warns heating fuel prices are increasing.
Some may have to chose between food and heat.
Duh...
Fuel prices are increasing because of the government war on coal
and the unrelenting assault on the value of the
dollar.


43 posted on 10/10/2013 8:37:37 AM PDT by Palio di Siena (Obama loves the USA like OJ loved Nicole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I hope that the GOPe has the stones to play this brinksmanship game and see it through.

I really wonder what the GovTeet Suckers would do when the Mt. Dew, lobster and wide screen TV flow dries up?

October 31st, 2013 at 11:59pm .. t-minus 21 days and counting...

44 posted on 10/10/2013 8:38:01 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Agreed. The baby with the bath water. Unfortunately, there are many people scamming the system and there is little interest from the bureaucrats running these programs to screen for the cheaters. Or make the able bodied work.

The moral question: is it fair for an honest working person, who is struggling to pay his bills and buy essentials, to pay for a some lazy SOB who gets to stay home and watch tv all day (maybe do and deal drugs), gets free food, health care, has more children, gets free services like phones, kids meals at school, free text books, etc. etc.

Two issues:

1. Begs the question — why work when you don't have to? Especially when people are trying to be honest. Makes honest people into dishonest people. It destroys society. When few people are working and paying into the system the whole system collapses.

2. The person on welfare will be stuck in it for ever. They lose all work skills and all hope and become complete dependents. They have no ownership of their lives and therefor don't manage their lives to find a job, make tough decisions like not having children because they can't afford it, etc. And their children become dependents, and so on. A pretty sad story.

45 posted on 10/10/2013 8:38:57 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I did have a former neighbor who was on food stamps, and got LiHeap assistance for her fuel bills.

She was a stay-at-home mom. Her husband was a mechanic at a local gas station. They had five kids. He was murdered in a robbery (perp made him lay down and shot him in the back of the head after he had emptied the safe for him). They were barely getting by before and losing the breadwinner just devastated them. She managed to raise those kids to adulthood with the added help, plus a local church food pantry. I had no problem with that.

Granted she represents that 2% of people who really did need the help.


46 posted on 10/10/2013 8:40:14 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

To be fair, if she got a job it would probably pay less than $10/hr. Take out taxes, transportation, the value of her time at home (cooking, cleaning, repairs). Consider that the work she does at home frees up her husband’s time. Take out child care if she works the same shift as her husband. Consider the strain on their marriage if she works a different shift.

A low-earning married woman with young children and an employed husband is almost certainly better off staying home, even without taxpayer-provided benefits. Providing daycare, unlicensed, paid under the table, would be a smart move for her and I hope she is - but telling the AP would not be a smart move.

Funny how illegal aliens can appear name, city, photo, in a story about the tribulations of the undocumented and the government doesn’t touch them, but let a citizen say she’s getting paid under the table so as to make ends meet - the IRS has ears.


47 posted on 10/10/2013 8:42:39 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
yeah growing government/socialism has reduced opportunity in America. but you can still make it if you work hard.

but I met a black guy , he lived in the hood. he got out ever day at 6 am in the morning knocking on peoples doors asking if they wanted their grass cut. then later moved on to ads on craiglist. you can still do it and get out and work. now he hires 50 people in his company. he worked 80 hours per day sweating in the southern sun , cutting grass. you can do it still but these leeches don't want to. he never got into the drugs and crime and came out ahead .can't do physical , well there's craiglist, internet, all sorts of mind only jobs or businesses, ideas , invent something etc.

48 posted on 10/10/2013 8:44:48 AM PDT by rurgan (give laws an expiration date:so the congress has to review every 4 years to see if needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Note to self:

Clean guns and buy a few more boxes of ammo.


49 posted on 10/10/2013 8:45:17 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

If the government does not kill the jobs first!


50 posted on 10/10/2013 8:47:43 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Unemployment claims will be way up with furlough workers.


51 posted on 10/10/2013 8:48:21 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

the gov is killing all the jobs and opportunity but you can still create your own job, your own business is my point.


52 posted on 10/10/2013 8:50:42 AM PDT by rurgan (give laws an expiration date:so the congress has to review every 4 years to see if needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Unfortunately, there are many people scamming the system and there is little interest from the bureaucrats running these programs to screen for the cheaters.

Welfare was never about helping people. It's about enslaving them to get their vote.

Madison was very clear on government "charity":

Annals of Congress, House of Representatives, 3rd Congress, 1st Session, page 170 (1794-01-10)
The Annals summarize speeches in the third person, with the actual text of Madison’s quote as follows: “Mr. Madison wished to relieve the sufferers, but was afraid of establishing a dangerous precedent, which might hereafter be perverted to the countenance of purposes very different from those of charity. He acknowledged, for his own part, that he could not undertake to lay his finger on that article in the Federal Constitution which granted a right of Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

53 posted on 10/10/2013 8:52:04 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

Thank you very much, rrrod!!


54 posted on 10/10/2013 8:53:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade
I don't know why I hit these type threads, they always raise my BP.

she counts on the family’s $460 monthly benefit to put food on the table

Mrs WBill and I shop very carefully. We hit the sales, clip coupons, use leftovers, and so on. Restaurant eating is cut out very nearly completely, as is pre-prepared food (think, frozen pizzas, etc etc). We did this because we needed to, on our budget.

$460/month is far more than my family spends on food. It's about the same as my monthly "household budget" - food and assorted other requirements like soap, TP, laundry detergent, etc etc etc.

If I had $460 to spend on food alone, Steak and seafood would be back on the table a lot more often. Eating out probably would be in the budget, as well.

I'm the one who's picking up the tab for this ungrateful leech, and I'm scraping to get by on less than what she's given. Color me unsympathetic.

55 posted on 10/10/2013 8:54:01 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Agreed. There’s not many cases like that but I have nothing against helping them. Except it shouldn’t be government doing it. With less taxation charities, honest ones, receive more and give to who really needs it. My church group quietly gives to several families in dire straights.


56 posted on 10/10/2013 8:54:37 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Incredible, isn’t it?


57 posted on 10/10/2013 8:55:06 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Why do you suppose that is?

They voted right. You didn't!

58 posted on 10/10/2013 8:56:15 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too... @Onelifetogive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

>>>And more than half go to those who are overweight. <<<

The woman whose family photos are in the articles is clearly obese. Her daughter is overweight as well.

You can also see an iPhone on the kitchen table of their “impoverished” home.


59 posted on 10/10/2013 8:56:59 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (The people have the right to tell government what guns it may possess, not the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rrrod; onyx

Thank you very much rrrod! God Bless!


60 posted on 10/10/2013 8:57:44 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson