Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup: 52% of Republicans Say America Needs a 3rd Party
CNS News ^ | 10/11/2013 | Terry Jeffery

Posted on 10/11/2013 10:41:08 AM PDT by Kazan

(CNSNews.com) - Fifty-two percent of Republicans say that America needs a third party, according to a newly released Gallup poll. Forty-nine percent of Democrats say the same thing.

"In fact,' said Gallup in its analysis of the poll, "this marks the first time that a majority of either party's supporters have said a third party is needed."

The Gallup survey, which interviewed 1,028 adults (18 and over) nationwide, asked: 'In your view, do the Republican and Democratic parties do an adequate job of representing the American people, or do they do such a poor job that a third major party is needed."

Overall, 60 percent said that a third party was needed, 26 percent said the Republicans and Democrats do an adequate job, and 14 percent said they had no opinion.

The 60 percent who said a third party was needed was the highest percentage giving that answer to Gallup since the polling company started asking the question back in 2003. The 26 percent who said the two major parties are doing an adequate is the lowest percentage who have given that answer.

Gallup did not publish any survey data about why those among the 60 percent think a third party is needed.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: gopestablishment; republicanparty; rinos; rinossplitgop; teaparty; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: 4rcane

there actually is an American Independent Party.


21 posted on 10/11/2013 10:54:20 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pluvmantelo
I didn’t dislike the man, but looking back I've concluded that Bush 43 mortally wounded the party.

Bush 41 did a damned good start. 43 was the coup de grâce.

22 posted on 10/11/2013 10:54:26 AM PDT by Dogbert41 (Up yours NSA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

No need for a third party.
Just kick out the Washington elite from the GOP.


23 posted on 10/11/2013 10:54:56 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
If you do not have the numbers to control the Republican Party, how on Earth are you going to win when EVERYONE votes in the General Election?

We do have the numbers. The problem is that the establishment is very entrenched, and difficult to dislodge. That we have come so far in 4 years is truly remarkable, but these things take time. And the events of the last few weeks have been a huge "fast forward" button.
24 posted on 10/11/2013 10:56:18 AM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
Run conservatives IN THE PRIMARY against RINO types.
That is what we need to do.
any other strategy is self-defeating and wont work.
25 posted on 10/11/2013 10:56:33 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue
The problem with this is that I suspect most people who answered affirmatively would want a more moderate approach to the third party regardless of where they politically align now.

The result of the last presidential election is PROOF that you are wrong.

Americans want a party they can vote for that they know will be seeking to reduce American government tyranny. I can think of Democrats and liberals I know who are as disgusted with government intrusion as conservatives are. The trade-off -- AND IT IS A GOOD ONE -- is that so-called "social" conservatives *cough* rick santorum huckabee *cough* will have to relinquish their goal of using government for charity and social engineering.

26 posted on 10/11/2013 10:56:44 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

It would be fine by me.

Watching the GOP leadership doggedly push amnesty (2007, 2013), watching their scurrilous backstabbing of Palin, watching them nominate a liberal from Massachusetts... it’s become more than obvious the Republican Party not only no longer shares my values, but holds me and my views in utter contempt.

Voted exclusively GOP my entire life, but I doubt I ever will again. I’ll have to see Palin or Cruz at the top of the ticket before I’ll even entertain such a notion.


27 posted on 10/11/2013 10:57:21 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

No we don’t

McCain, Ryan, McConnell, cornyn, anyone else who (oh, Graham) has been collaborating with, complimenting, fraternizing and otherwise promoting the party of abortion, post constitutionalism and general socialism, and otherwise just generally not representing his or her voters as republicans and American constitutional interests as advertised and, oh, sworn to do, can form their own party.

And they can prove their laziness and worthlessness in their failure to do as much as to split away and come up with a name for themselves.

No thanks

The Republican Party, the GOP is doing just fine.

It is under new management


28 posted on 10/11/2013 10:57:32 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

Three parties would make impeachment much more feasible, but the gop would swing left if there was a right party.


29 posted on 10/11/2013 10:58:01 AM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Run conservatives IN THE PRIMARY against RINO types. That is what we need to do. any other strategy is self-defeating and wont work.

What is self-defeating is voting for RINOs in the general election. They are an even greater threat to this country than Democrats are, because they suck the wind out of any real opposition. I can safely say 2 things:

1) I will never again vote for a non-Tea Party Republican; and

2) I am not alone.
30 posted on 10/11/2013 11:00:32 AM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I’m sure every democrat agrees with this.


31 posted on 10/11/2013 11:00:43 AM PDT by barmag25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pluvmantelo
I don't think so, or at least not directly. Really the RINO thing has been a problem for a long ime. In fact, pre-Goldwater, the GOP pretty much was nothing but what we think of today as RINOs. Even as the conservatives began to take over the party, those old-line Republicans (and their heirs) were still around, and remained the administrative backbone of the party. Not surprising that, once ceonservatives started to look likely to really cut back the governemnt, those old-line Republicans started to try to take the party back.

Bush 41 was certainly one of the old-line crowd, but was willing to work with conservatives. I think Bush 43 was more conservative than his father, but probably still full of old-line tendencies.

But really once 9/11 and the War on Terror happened, Bush 43 became somewhat irrelevant in the struggle between old-line and conservative until the left managed to demonize the war and the party in power. That was when the old-line types really thought they had a solid lock on re-taking the party, and Bush 43 worked with them because he was pretty much out of allies otherwise.

32 posted on 10/11/2013 11:01:31 AM PDT by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I’d say they need a second party, at this point.


33 posted on 10/11/2013 11:01:39 AM PDT by MortMan (Disarming the sheep only emboldens the wolves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
People seem to pay plenty of lip service to third parties when there are no elections near.

Then, as it gets closer & closer to election day, those same people start dropping like flies & bending over backwards to explain why we MUST, MUST, MUST vote for some lukewarm, quasi-liberal GOP candidate for the good of the known universe.

Most recent example -- Romney in 2012.

This time will be no different. Mark my words.

34 posted on 10/11/2013 11:01:46 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic
Bush’s fault???

Patriot act. Trying to build two nations and failing miserably. TSA. Medicare part D. Light bulb ban. TARP. Spending increased faster than it did under Clinton. Amnesty, three times we had to tell the jerk not just no, but hell no. He earned lots of blame.

35 posted on 10/11/2013 11:01:52 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Since the GOP has proved that it hates conservatives, will attack conservatives, and wants conservatives to vote for them and then shut up... why on earth would any conservative vote for the GOP?

/johnny

36 posted on 10/11/2013 11:03:47 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

That’s a little low... I am certain it’s more than 52%

We’ll know soon enough! ;)


37 posted on 10/11/2013 11:04:16 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

McConnell and Boehner better understand their actions can have serious conseuquences.

Fiscal responsibility is a winning idea and if the GOP wants to be the Grand Obamalite Party they will pay.


38 posted on 10/11/2013 11:04:40 AM PDT by Nextrush (BALANCED BUDGET NOW, PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN,CHANGE I BELIEVE IN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5
The Republican Party is road kill.
The best way to start a new party is to have Independents run. This tactic has been very successful for Democrats and will work to get Conservatives elected as a cadre for a new Party. With the elected officials that want to keep support from Sarah Palin, the path has already been opened.
TWB
39 posted on 10/11/2013 11:05:23 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I think that was effectively done during about hour two of the filibuster.

Last ones to realize it will be the whimpering McCain and McConnell in the months to come.

THe moderate electorate will continue to cry< ‘stop the bickering’, like an overindulgent mother. But the new leaders will be rubbing dirt on it in the huddle,, and will come out again, unapologetically.


40 posted on 10/11/2013 11:07:10 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson