Posted on 10/15/2013 7:15:11 AM PDT by Nachum
Damage to the walls would have been telling. Other than the one statement by a medial examiner, I haven’t seen anything that remotely supports the official version. Where’s the proof?
There was no massacre at Sandy Hook.
<><><
Where are the sons and daughters alleged to have been killed? They have not been seen in public since the alleged shooting.
And yes, I am using the word alleged with extreme contempt.
After the 1984 McDonald’s massacre in San Ysidro Cali, that building was also torn down.
Well said, Newtown Selectman Will Rodgers.
Your statement should be required reading for any government official trying to participate in and justify a cover-up.
Drag the jurors to the scene and give them the bloody first-hand experience. I see points on both sides. Lawsuits could take years, so don’t delay reconstruction. The lawyers just need to be sure they walk the area and have all the evidence they need, NOW!
“There is NOTHING IN THEIR BEHAVIOR to indicate these people have been through a tragedy/murder scene.”
There is nothing in your post to indicate you have a shred of human decency or intellect.
Oh I’m sure they’ll be running all the evidence down to your office shortly, since getting your approval for the “official version” is so important to everyone.
Yes, I remember the San Ysidro massacre. McD decided to demolish the building rather than reopen it.
I think any claim here is going to rely heavily on deficiencies in the physical plant and security - not just any "crime scene."
How is your buddy Robbie Parker doing with his "grief" these days?
Still waiting for your answer to where are the kids who you think weren’t killed, but have not been seen in close to a year since the, uh, non-shooting that did not happen at Newtown?
Oh, and video of you shortly after your child was murdered would be really helpful as well, so we can all know what grief should look like, because, as we all know, everyone reacts to grief in exactly the same way.
You know what, come to think of it, you have inspired me. The Aurora shooter, James Holmes, clearly not guilty of anything. He just didn’t look like a guy that shot up a movie theatre. He looked like he was just made up for the movie, you know, like the kids back in the day used to do for Rocky Horror Picture Show.
Do I need a sarcasm tag for that last paragraph?
PROPER.
I love the forum and many friends here
But its always been at least 15% fruit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCqOMdcutWQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFyexz_IuHE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gowSlrus_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X6SCjYVzPc
Sally Cox, Robbie Parker, Gene Rosen and countless other "witnesses" and their Cheshire grins and lies shouldn't be tolerated. I cannot believe how many people believe these damn LIARS.
Who grins like this at the funeral of his daughter? And before that laughs and grins before "going LIVE" on the TV?
WHO???
Look up Gene Rosen and his actor's guild and FEMA connections.
I find it odd that other than the examiner’s statement, not conclusive, no proof was released that would verify the weapons used.
C’mon Prole. Stop evading.
Where are the kids you allege were never killed in the first place?
Most people are satisfied with the medical examiner’s statement, because that is about all we get when there isn’t a trial. The only people who aren’t satisfied with it are the ones who assume something funny is going on and the M.E. must be in on it. Those people wouldn’t accept any proof no matter what was offered, so nobody cares about trying to satisfy them.
Yeah, as if anyone would pay me to point out how crazy you are to the internet. That’s not delusional at all. /s
If you do hear about a job opening like that, let me know, because it sounds like a supremely easy gig.
“There was no massacre at Sandy Hook.”
—
I’ll be darned. :-)
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.