Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

New political expression: LINO.

Please share with all Virginia friends.

1 posted on 10/25/2013 2:10:07 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TBP

A Democrat ?


2 posted on 10/25/2013 2:13:02 PM PDT by molson209 (Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

Can a Clinton crime machine member win any election without someone splitting the vote?

Calling it now-Hillary will win because a third party will split the GOP vote.


6 posted on 10/25/2013 2:18:26 PM PDT by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP
While I’m closer to Sarvis’s viewpoint than Cuccinelli’s on marriage, marijuana, and I am sure other policy issues as well, there have been a number of concerning red flags about Sarvis’s positions.

Notice that he admits that Sarvis is lefty/libertarian on many issues, like the homosexual agenda, but that Sarvis isn't conservative enough on economic issues.

Libertarians=liberals who want conservative economics, which is an oxy-moron of course, you can't have economic conservatism without social conservatism.

9 posted on 10/25/2013 2:23:40 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

He’s really not a libertarian. That’s why Ron Paul has endorsed Ken.


10 posted on 10/25/2013 2:31:29 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

This gus is such a worthless SOB. He’s practicing Alynski: Don’t debate your opponenst. Destroy him. Ignore this lightweight. He has nothing to offer but noise.


11 posted on 10/25/2013 2:43:20 PM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

Sarvis is on record that he wants to tax carbon emissions, but still squawks about his “limited government” platform.

During last night’s debate, McAuliffe noted that he and Sarvis share many of the same views, and contrasted them with the “radical” views of Cuccinelli. That convinced me that Sarvis is just a stalking horse.


14 posted on 10/25/2013 4:19:48 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

BTTT


16 posted on 10/25/2013 6:43:05 PM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP; fieldmarshaldj; Maelstorm; AuH2ORepublican; Clintonfatigued; randita; sickoflibs; BillyBoy; ...

A LINO huh? Someone tell all the morons that are gonna vote for him.


17 posted on 10/25/2013 8:38:25 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP
Sarvis has probably received the bulk of his donations indirectly from McAulife. This will be the new RAT strategy going forward. In a tight race? Hire a 3rd party candidate to siphon off votes from the GOP candidate.
18 posted on 10/25/2013 10:14:41 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

I read the transcript of his Chuck Todd interview and he sure sounds like one. He is actually a failed Republican candidate. He has some good ideas on how to produce more Doctors and Nurses and his 2nd amendment stance is good but on expanding Medicare he is horrible saying that we can’t expand Medicare till we fix government interference in healthcare/make it more efficient. Well that is not a good answer. The libertarian answer and the conservative answer is to NOT EXPAND it ever. The true conservative and libertarian would sever all federal management and regulation of healthcare and return it to the states.

Cuccinelli is the only candidate opposing the expansion. I watched Sarvis during the round table in Richmond today and he just looked stoned and came off as if the only reason to vote for him is because he supports ssm as if gay activism is anywhere near the primary concern of Virginians. Conservatives get blamed for pushing their ideology but they are the ones demanding everyone be taught to love Jesus in schools as lgbt activists are trying to force every child to be taught to praise and love homsexuality. Sarvis also is hugely pro-abortion.


21 posted on 10/26/2013 2:42:58 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Obamacare is your healthcare on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP
Is Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Robert Sarvis a Libertarian-In-Name-Only?

Well, is he a drug-crazed, baby-killing, packer (who likes smaller government)?

If not, then he's a LINO.

22 posted on 10/26/2013 2:48:26 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ("The government" is nothing but a RAT jobs program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

I never see threads about Sarvis’s tax policy & views on Obamacare.

If he’s the better choice shouldn’t he be promoting his fiscal ideas??


23 posted on 10/26/2013 2:59:56 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson