Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Target Removing Criminal History Section from Job Applications
Afro ^ | 11/1/13 | Alexis Taylor

Posted on 11/04/2013 8:19:16 AM PST by YourAdHere

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Buckeye McFrog

bump


41 posted on 11/04/2013 9:14:17 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
I believe she’s lying. Being arrested is NOT the same thing as serving time in prison.

Actually, on this one narrow point, she tells the truth. Arrests are public knowledge too, and can (and have personally) disqualified.

42 posted on 11/04/2013 9:16:10 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

1. An arrest does not a criminal make. It’s that whole “innocent until proven guilty” thing. Often, charges are dismissed, there’s no indictment etc. So there’s no point in asking about arrests.

2. Convictions are a different kettle of fish. But the person may have been convicted of something incredbily minor with no moral turpitude (e.g. underage possession of alcohol) or of an offense that is no longer a crime in some states (e.g. minor possession of marijuana).

3. Just because it can’t or won’t ask on a job application doesn’t mean it can’t still check (with the Internet, it’s super easy).


43 posted on 11/04/2013 9:16:43 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

Of course in this modern internet world where you can look up anybody’s arrest record for free who needs to put it on the app? Just have your HR bookmark a couple of site and plug all applicants into these search. Really at this point all you need from an applicant is their name and socsec, anything else you want to know about them you can get on your own in less time.


44 posted on 11/04/2013 9:17:22 AM PST by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Well put. I might differ partially on the “felons shouldn’t vote” part. I would qualify that with “if it’s a violent felony or you were caught with a weapon, then you lose your right to vote.”


45 posted on 11/04/2013 9:19:08 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: steelhead_trout

Good Lord. I work at Target in healthcare. Their sales aren’t exactly strong right now ...so many dumb moves ...I hate it.


46 posted on 11/04/2013 9:23:53 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

Of course their prices will have to increase to cover all the theft by employees.

Because, they are lining themselves up to hire some very accomplished thieves... and worse.

Target is absolute junk anyway, but they’ll have to pad the bill for everyone else!!


47 posted on 11/04/2013 9:25:43 AM PST by SMARTY ("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

The problem with hiring felons, knowingly or unknowingly(you should have asked) is the fact that the employer becomes a sitting duck for lawsuits should that employee commit another crime. Trial lawyers use it as a stick to beat you with regardless of any and all circumstances. You become ‘partially responsible’ and if you happen to be the only party with deep pockets who get to pay the entire judgment. Sure, the check can be moved to after an initial interview, which has a cost associated, and disqualify the candidate later, but for how long? The purpose of these advocacy groups is to make it illegal to refuse to hire based on criminal record without any concomitant immunity from lawsuits. Lawyers will get to sue for ‘civil’ rights’ violations on the front end and damages on the back end: sweet.


48 posted on 11/04/2013 9:26:08 AM PST by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

Actually I think I agree with this to a degree. I think a company should only go back say... 7-10 years on convictions.

I worked in HR for a company that paid very well so all the locals wanted to work there. They typically had to work as temp laborers, pass drug tests and background.

One guy worked as a temp for awhile - and I don’t know why it took so long to get the info but he’d worked there a week or two before they found out he had a selling marijuana conviction. I overheard him talking to the HR manager who was in the process of firing him, he said “when will I ever be able to put this behind me? It’s been over 20 years and it still haunts me and keeps me from getting a good paying job”.

Course, that would be drug convictions, not sure how I’d feel about rape, crimes of pedophilia, maybe go back forever on them.


49 posted on 11/04/2013 9:26:21 AM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks

If Target’s sales are weak, it’s because Wally World is perceived as undercutting them in prices. Their electronics and sporting goods lines are lousy, too, by the way. Nothing to do with whether or not they ask for arrests or convictions for their new hires.


50 posted on 11/04/2013 9:26:58 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Applicants will still be investigate. They just won’t be asked to lie about it.


51 posted on 11/04/2013 9:27:28 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelhead_trout
I might differ partially on the “felons shouldn’t vote” part. I would qualify that with “if it’s a violent felony or you were caught with a weapon, then you lose your right to vote.”

I agree, perhaps a violent crime but say you sold marijuana 20 years ago, does that mean you should have no right to vote today?

52 posted on 11/04/2013 9:27:58 AM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Exactamundo!
53 posted on 11/04/2013 9:28:39 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere
The National Employment Law Project is a George Soros creation.
54 posted on 11/04/2013 9:36:53 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

Awesome. The losses will multiply as the morons running that company continue to hire thugs and crooks. Eventually it will collapse and someone responsible will take over.

The Target stores in my area, once much nicer than Wal-Mart, have been turning ghetto.


55 posted on 11/04/2013 9:39:48 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Not to mention the number of innocent people convicted because they could only afford public pretenders.

It’s getting to the point that we are all criminals in the eyes of those who want to rule over a subservient people.


56 posted on 11/04/2013 9:43:54 AM PST by antidisestablishment (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Salvation Army at Walmart, in my part of Florida, during Christmas


57 posted on 11/04/2013 9:44:43 AM PST by capt B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

That has to be there for all who work with children.


58 posted on 11/04/2013 9:45:26 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt B

I might try that next Halloween, be Santa and give away candy to people. lol.


59 posted on 11/04/2013 9:49:38 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere

What does it matter?

Theft, burglary, breaking and entering, shop-lifting.....It’s OKAY now. Obama has your back.


60 posted on 11/04/2013 9:57:25 AM PST by Rapscallion (The people of the lie compel you to buy Obamacare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson