Posted on 11/14/2013 8:39:52 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 11/14/2013 9:02:20 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON Facing dissent from his own party and growing pressure from anxious Congressional Democrats, President Obama is to propose on Thursday an administrative fix to a central element of his signature health care law, allowing Americans who are losing their health insurance coverage because of the Affordable Care Act to retain it.
A House Democrat with knowledge of the presidents plan said that the fix would allow insurance companies to renew plans that do not meet the higher standard of the new health care law for a year for existing policyholders, though they would be required to notify the policy holder of alternative available coverage options, as well any benefits they might lose by staying on their existing plan.
The presidents proposal would apply only to people who have had their existing policies already canceled those currently without insurance would not be able to buy these old plans, said the lawmaker, who declined to be identified discussing the proposal before the presidents announcement.
State insurance commissioners would have the right to override the administrative proposal.
Mr. Obama is scheduled to make remarks on his changes to the law at 11:30 a.m.
Earlier in the day, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, hinted that a change to the Affordable Care Act was likely before the end of the week.
Stay tuned. It could be an administrative fix, it could be a legislative fix, said Ms. Pelosi, speaking at the Washington Ideas Forum. I would rather it be done administratively, because then it could be done much more quickly without any accompanying agendas.
Excerpt, read more at the New York Times
Under what authority does the President (ANY President) have to simply modify laws which were passed by Congress? I mean, without having to go BACK to Congress to get these changes codified into an actual LAW?
I mean, as written, these insurance companies can NOT just make wholesale changes because a President said, Okay, just do it! They could be held liable, REGARDLESS of what the President said!
The first person who keeps his old plan, then has some medical condition which is NOT covered under the old plan, but WOULD BE covered under an Obamacare plan, has a very STRONG legal leg with which to beat the insurance company to death!
And when the insurance companies say, The President said it was okay. The courts are going to FORCE the insurance companies to pay and will probably award damages, because the LAW says they MUST comply!
If I was the insurance companies, I would say, NO EFFING WAY are we going to operate on the word of a KNOWN LIAR! Because it will be THEIR asses that pay, not The Won!
"......Several states have already announced that all non-compliant plans, regardless of the ACAs other grandfathering provisions, must be canceled, and nothing in the White Houses announcement will compel them to reverse that decision. Further, the approximately 5 million Americans whove seen their plans canceled already wont necessary get to renew them. Thatll be up to insurance companies, though as the White House noted, it is simpler for both regulators and insurers to continue or adjust existing plans than cancel them and write new ones, so some people whose plans were going to be canceled will surely be offered the chance to renew them.
Officials characterized it as an administrative fix HHS will be deferring enforcement, in other words, of the ACAs minimum-coverage provisions that had caused so many insurance companies to cancel non-compliant plans for 2014. She defended this enforcement discretion as a strategy thats been used both in transition and as a predecessor to legislation in the past, though the only example she adduced was also a legally dubious Obama-administration maneuver, the White Houses enactment of the DREAM Act.
When asked whether HHS was going to determine how much premiums could increase in these plans, or otherwise regulate them, an official said thats a question best directed to insurance companies and insurers...... Source NRO
That's what I'd like to know.
Le Roi, C’est Moi!
So, apparently Obama can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, no matter what Congressionally passed law says? Don’t dictators do that?
Still, Obama will just do what Obama does until he is challenged in court, which no one has the cojones to do.
What I REALLY want to know is why Obama is allowing these “rotten apple insurance” companies to continue their supposed “substandard” and “garbage” policies.
The OTHER thing I’d really like to know is if this is all the greedy insurance companies fault for cancelling these “substandard” and “garbage” policies, then why is it REQUIRED that Obama ALLOW them to reinstate them?
Well he really took a dump on the heath insurance industry with this one.
First the central planners have been telling us for a couple of weeks that those dropped from a plan cannot be allowed to be placed back on it like there was some law of physics preventing it rather than human debris government types standing in the way like they always do.
Now, he wants to ALLOW insurance companies to go back and reinstate plans after he MANDATED changes in coverage requirements AND do it in the busiest time of the year for plan renewals!
This time of year the Insurance industry is going full bore because so many plans have a DEC 1—>31 renewal date. Requests for quotes, proposals, employee presentations and sales are at their peak and a piece of crap for a human being thinks he can just drop this CACA © (”Can’t Afford Care Act”) on their plate.
To all the Insurance company CEO’s who bent over to kiss his butt because they thought 30 million more people could be billed, well you got it so now what are you going to do about it? Speak against the regime and you will no longer be on the list of approved Insurance companies.
NO!!!
NO MORE LEGISLATING BY THE EXECUTIVE!!!
Let the "Unprepared One" stew in his incompetent juices...
Just had to fix that.
Almost all monarchs have a smattering of training for the job...
Most dictators don't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.