[Windflier]

Single sourcing the concept of head movement from a “movie of official reference” is the first error of the lay public, which does provide significant profits for the leftist conspiracy nuts.

I don't need a so-called 'expert' to explain what I've seen with my own two eyes. Especially when said 'expert' is trying to convince me that the simple display of physics I've just witnessed was caused by a force which runs exactly opposite to the known laws of the universe.

What you're selling sounds precisely like the doublespeak libs have been thrusting down our throats for generations:

"Your health care plan wasn't cancelled - it was upgraded!"

Utter bs.

[John S Mosby]

Enjoy your fantasy. My point made by your post here. The public wishes to be played... will be. Anger and emotion always cloud reason, and supply the impetus for statements like “simple display of physics I’ve just witnessed”. Watched a movie or... you were there? Write a book— so many have based on far less, and the point I was making writ large.

Reflex/neurophysiology forensic examination explains the motion. Digitized spatter pattern studies also corroborate.

Far be it for a field that has made great advances to counter what “lying eyes” can see. Because of course, seeing is believing, and the “movie” is holy writ. Hollywood here we come. Deo Vindice.