Posted on 11/25/2013 9:42:46 AM PST by Red Badger
You are making very serious accusations against the Creation Museum.
In fact, you are accusing the Creation Museum of perpetrating a fraud against the American people and Creation Science theory and fact establishment.
<><><>
Perhaps you should go back and re-read your post 42 on this thread. Didn’t seem to bother you when the shoe was on the other foot.
It very well could be a watch dinosaur depicted at the Creation Museum or maybe used for some other domesticated task such as hunting, herding or retrieving.
An how can creation scientists be right, when the Bishop Ussher (sp?) has clearly stated the exact day month and year for us hundreds of years ago based on those very precise begats listed in the Bible.
That hands-down wins the Question That Will Be Avoided With the Most Gusto Award - nice!!!
If YEC’s say that dinosaurs lived in separae Eco-sysems away from humans, then obviously they would not have been using them with saddles. Furthermore, something domesticated and as big as a dinosaur when dying would be buried near humans, just like dead dogs and cats. Creation museum is lying about something.
RE: watch dinosaur.
Nothing worse than a junk yard dinosaur...
Mean, and they own the lot.
>> “If dinosaurs were domesticated shouldn’t we find their fossils mixed with human remains?” <<
.
And we do!
That is proven beyond a shadow of doubt. If the Inca feared them, they would have demonstrated that fear in respect. The fearsome dragons were in southeast Asia, where Alexander’s expeditions found them, and in central Africa, and in fact they still live in the swamps of the Congo, where they are truly feared.
I bought a motor from a “junkyard dinosaur” once.
>> “Furthermore, something domesticated and as big as a dinosaur when dying would be buried near humans, just like dead dogs and cats. Creation museum is lying about something.” <<
.
You just might benefit from a total frontal lobe transplant. One of the Inca stones shows how to do that!
>> “You are making very serious accusations against the Creation Museum.” <<
.
dmz makes no “serious” anything here. He is a forever-child that is incapable of grasping reality that firmly.
Hahaha. I have a friend who ownes a junk yard.
I asked him one time why he never got rid of the
big pile of rustin scrap metal in the middle
of his yard.
He told me it was there just for the IRS man
to look at.
Some of that proof would be welcome or is this another one of those amazing discoveries that you’ve seen with your own eyes but which have left no trace whatsoever on the Internet?
What are you talking about?
dmz makes no “serious” anything here. He is a forever-child that is incapable of grasping reality that firmly.
<><><><
I’m crushed. But even so, are the words dinosaur and dragon synonymous in your world?
Yes, in terms of historic writings, dragons in history are dinosaurs in modern parlance. There are also other words that could be equated, in various circumstances, as in the case of an obvious T-Rex in Beowulf being given a name.
Such instances are of course necessarily to be examined in context.
Some of them all of the time, and all of them some of the time.
similar from elsewhere:
What was found was the extensive Chinese/Gobi Desert dinosaur bone beds, which the Chinese did a fine job of converting into the mythology of dragons, and exporting around the world like gun powder, and noodles/spaghetti.
The ravings of a loon in denial!
To add to the mystery, what kind of spurs did the dino-pokes use on those monsters?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.