So true. Setting aside the fact that this particular episode was a hoax and a fraud, the fact that some on here are condoning the stiffing of the waitress is appalling.
As I understand it, the waitress did not participate in lesbian sex with the customer. She served them food and drink. So she should have been compensated for that which she did, and left alone (at this time) for that which she didn’t do. There’s a time and a place for everything ..
So reasoned and so wrong. Only if the waitress did not appear as a lesbian does your argument hold. She was obviously a lesbian, so you comment condones homosexuality. Is this what you intended?