Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/07/2014 10:51:07 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin



2 posted on 01/07/2014 10:52:37 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ( a Safe..and Sane....2014 To All!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When asked about the pause in temperatures, they claim global warming is now hiding in the deep ocean.

Of course in science heat rises, so for Global Warming to work it must mean heat is magically descending below cold.

Hence Global Warming = Magic


3 posted on 01/07/2014 10:58:36 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
There are a boat load of PhDs in meteorology that are losing credibility and respect faster than a two dollar prostitute at a Naval base on a Saturday night.
4 posted on 01/07/2014 10:59:11 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It was 18°F on my porch this morning.................in FLORIDA...................


5 posted on 01/07/2014 11:03:53 AM PST by Red Badger (Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

All based on believing the chain-of-custody of the data from the sensors to the presented documents have in no possible way been altered. Starting at the reader of the sensors all the way through the charts and graphs producers.

That’s if those same sensors have a valid calibration seals and corresponding calibration certifications that also have a chain-of-custody that proves none of them are falsified or altered. All sensors are within the calibration times prior to their expiration and due date for the next calibration.

REAL science is tough. It requires verifiable proof, not just “because I said so”. Including independent organizations launching surprise inspections of the sensors and documentation.

The sensors placement should not be within 200 meters of any manmade structure or any natural cover.


6 posted on 01/07/2014 11:09:36 AM PST by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Some folks assume that these work because of some type of scientific principle, but that is an illusion. They really use magic.

8 posted on 01/07/2014 11:25:57 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Marginalize the marginalizers. Rent seekers co-opting science to coerce consensus via expulsion are NOT scientists.
10 posted on 01/07/2014 11:51:10 AM PST by Avoiding_Sulla (How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Consensus” science is definitionally not science. It’s the combination of a couple of logical fallacies:

1. Argumentum ad numerum or argument or appeal to numbers, and;
2. Argumentum ad vericundiam or argument or appeal to authority.

“Most scientists” can be wrong (and ARE wrong in this case). And those “most scientists” are NOT qualified to make public policy pronouncements.

Essentially “scientists” for all practical purposes became a priesthood, apostles of materialism. And Americans have swallowed most of their biased pronouncements as the scientific truth they ain’t.

1Ti 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:


18 posted on 01/07/2014 1:27:34 PM PST by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson