Harvey is a worthless little toad. He should give up all the money he ever made on violent or sexual movies. Then we’ll talk.
Just don’t spell his name wrong.
Excuse me for being skeptical about Mr. Weinstein’s “epiphany”, at least for now.
Actions speak a whole lot louder than words do.
I’ll wait and see if he is sincere.
I was thinking about what someone would have to pay me to watch the Streep movie in the theaters now.
I settled on $1000.
Harvey Weinstein absolutely owns guns. If he has ever hired a security detail, then he is paying for guns. It might not be in his hand, but it is under his control. This is gun ownership by proxy. Just because I cannot afford a private security guard does not mean that I should be left defenseless.
Do you really think this leftist very rich POS is changing? Does a chamelon ever permanently change? Does a skunk ever stop smelling? Does a marxist ever have a change of heart in the US (the last one was over 20 years ago when Prof. Eugene Genevese (once of Princeton), admitted that he was wrong to support the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War.
No, Weinstein is a hardcore leftist. Follow his moneytrail and see who got it. Then tell me he has changed. I’ll believe that when he gives millions to the Tea Party organizations, to the NRA, and to the Heritage Foundation.
Waiting...Waiting...Waiting. Getting damned hungry while WAITING.
Good for him? the slimebag realized that he was about to throw millions of dollars down the drain in order to show his hypocrisy in producing a movie that only a few libtards would actually spend their money to watch.........
BS...the man has made his pile...
NOW he wants to change his tune? BS...
Harvey is walking his mean fighting/ firing words back for now, so his pet project will look like a better investment. As soon as he has enough financial and starpower security, out come the elephant guns, back in goes the contrition. Harvey expects the kind of person who sees his films will have already forgotten the violent, baiting language he is using today. He’s not worried, sees it as a really fun game, that he has (government) rigged to win.
Movies don’t make people violent. It’s all in the morality or lack of morality in each individual.
Event lines of work that include much violence don’t make people violent. After doing such a line of work for long, a moral man will only see less excitement and more sadness around him.
Here’s an idea Harvey...make an anti-NRA film, an anti-Obama film, and an anti-Muslim film.
Then we can see who does and who doesn’t make your life a living hell.
Now I, and many millions more, know he is a huge hypocrite who made millions on movies about people getting shot with guns... If he means it, he should give all his money made with evil gun violence to the poor or victims or something...
I think the publicity is back-firing on him big time, and he's trying to walk his fat mouth back.
Too late!
harvey doesn’t give a crap about idealism, right/wrong, or making a difference. He’s all about ego and power. Like most leftists he’s all about style over substance. He’d rather say the right (politically correct) thing than do the right thing.
It remains to be seen if he will find the financiers for his idiotic little project.
Don’t go bat shit over this.
HW is a money man. He’s produced lots of crap, and some wonderful films.
What makes money?
Apparently not anti NRA films.
Some of the films he’s produced are fantastic - some of the best I’ve ever seen.
And they made money.
Money. Money. Money.
He’s produced several of my friends TV shows - idiotic shows, but they made money.
Money.
If he’s changed his tune in the last day or so, WE ARE DOING OUR JOB! Less money for HW.
Stay strong!
Weinstein was being skewered coast to coast — he’s just trying to contain the damage after the public began to smell the stench of his epic hypocrisy.
Screw him, he is a far left jackass who wants everyone’s guns to be taken away from them yet he has armed guards protecting his ass..He is only backtracking now because he knows his idiotic film would make no money
The "Conspiracy Against Rights" Law, Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241.
It says: Any Two or More Persons - who conspire to deprive a citizen of a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution (like the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights), may be held personally responsible for damages. If these public officials conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate ANY PERSON in ANY STATE, Territory or District in the free exercise of any Right secured to him by the Constitution of the United States, that public servant(s) can be found guilty, and can be punished by up to 10 years in jail.
(And THAT means that if someone looses their life because you took away means of self defense, you are an enabler of murder. One of these sad days this is going to occur and I hope some politician(s) pay dearly.)
I don’t think so. He may change for ONE film but when this has blown over, he’ll work his way back into more gratuitous violence.His brief hiatus from violence will be seen as penitence/ He obviously got pressure from his liberal friends, who knew he’d gone too far...his “we’ll destroy them” rhetoric did not play particularly well anywhere.
If only he had waited until a month before the movie, like Jim Carrey did to sink his own comeback flick KickAss2.