Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul warns Texas could turn blue (Tepid audience response to Amnesty comments)
Politico ^ | 2/9/14 | KATIE GLUECK

Posted on 02/09/2014 10:03:55 AM PST by jimbo123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: Norm Lenhart
The founding fathers were in favor of immigration.

Otherwise, we would not have any Italian or Irish folks here.

61 posted on 02/09/2014 11:49:28 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The answer is economic freedom ... from the gov’t.
To quote a saying “the business of America is business.”

Freedom from regulation after regulation both state and federal i believe is a winning message.

Stating what laws you would repeal and not create would resonate with many.


62 posted on 02/09/2014 11:52:07 AM PST by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Sure they were. But not Rand Paul/GOPe style ‘immigration’ or for the reasons that this band of merry liberals wants ‘immigration.’


63 posted on 02/09/2014 11:59:37 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I knew that bastard couldn’t be trusted.


64 posted on 02/09/2014 12:03:05 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

“Otherwise, we would not have any Italian or Irish folks here.”

I’m pretty sure that the Founding Fathers predeceased the waves of Italian and Irish immigration, and I very much doubt that they would have allowed a wave of immigration from anywhere outside Europe.


65 posted on 02/09/2014 12:07:36 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

But Paul remarked that the response was “kind of tepid.”

***
I wish it had not been tepid; I wish they had given him nice warm tar followed by a dusting of feathers.


66 posted on 02/09/2014 12:10:52 PM PST by Bigg Red (O LORD, our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth! Ps 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Yes, and any immigrants who showed signs of TB, for instance, were not allowed in at Ellis Island. Nowadays, we’re seeing small epidemics of diseases which were thought to have been almost eradicated in a formerly first world nation.


67 posted on 02/09/2014 12:16:57 PM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Legalized, or amnestied, they all vote commie from day one.


68 posted on 02/09/2014 12:17:59 PM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Not all of them.

Those who come hither are generally of the most ignorant Stupid Sort of their own Nation . . . and as few of the English understand the German Language, and so cannot address them either from the Press or Pulpit, ’tis almost impossible to remove any prejudices they once entertain. . . . Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it. . . . I remember when they modestly declined intermeddling in our Elections, but now they come in droves, and carry all before them, except in one or two Counties. . . . In short unless the stream of their importation could be turned from this to other colonies, as you very judiciously propose, they will soon so out number us, that all the advantages we have will not in My Opinion be able to preserve our language, and even our Government will become precarious. - Benjamin Franklin

69 posted on 02/09/2014 12:18:39 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Rand Paul's immigration speech
...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
70 posted on 02/09/2014 12:44:13 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
It’s clear now why Rand Paul is backing Mitch McConnell and not Matt Bevin. Paul has turned against the very people who elected him in 2010.

The loonatarians will be throwing the Paul Dynasty heir into the primaries to help the GOP-e screw over conservative candidates again.

71 posted on 02/09/2014 12:54:24 PM PST by lonevoice (We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

very well could. Big cities choose how the state swings.


72 posted on 02/09/2014 1:36:06 PM PST by 12th_Monkey (One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

Don't trust Rand Paul!

73 posted on 02/09/2014 1:51:56 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Actually he’s correct. And hiding your head in the sand won’t change reality.

Look at the K-12 demographics of Texas schools.


74 posted on 02/09/2014 2:31:25 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

95 % of Mexicans in Texas are here legally.

Remember that California was a Republican state until the party committed suicide.


75 posted on 02/09/2014 2:32:55 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

He is betraying Kentucky voters. No serious segment of Kentucky thinks Rand Paul should move quickly on immigration reform to help his perceived national goals.

There are bigger problems than Texas turning blue in 2036.

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114145/blue-texas-eight-charts-show-why-it-wont-happen

Still, Texas would not go Democratic until 2036.

The second step would be a presidential candidate who could do as well with white voters as President Obama did in 2008. Of course, such a candidate would be on his or her way to a national landslide, in which case Texas’s electoral votes would be gravy, not a cornerstone of victory.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics-july-dec13-texas_07-09/
So for the last decade, Hispanics have only cast 20 percent of total votes cast in statewide elections. That’s got to go up toward 30 percent before the Democrats can get competitive.


76 posted on 02/09/2014 2:42:14 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Bttt


77 posted on 02/09/2014 3:48:29 PM PST by right way right (America has embraced the suck of Freedumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Rand can stuff his Shamnesty straight up his smelly Soetoro hole.


78 posted on 02/09/2014 3:52:41 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth
Rand can stuff his Shamnesty straight up his smelly Soetoro hole.

Exactly.
79 posted on 02/09/2014 3:55:47 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Randy Paul has never been a conservative. He is exactly like the old man, a libertarian that will soon be telling republicans they need to stop focusing on “social issues”, i.e, queer “marriage” or they will never win again.


80 posted on 02/09/2014 4:26:37 PM PST by NKP_Vet ("I got a good Christian raisin', and 8th grade education, aint no need ya'll treatin' me this way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson