Not this particular report, but this only represents a very small area of scientific literature that has been examined.
Right, I hope they go after global warming also.
But if 120 papers containing gibberish can be published in “mainstream” scientific journals, what good are the journals? How much of what they publish is worthless, or worse? There was a story some years ago of a young hot-shot German physics PhD who was getting all kinds of amazing results in various fields. Turns out, it was just “matlab” science. Impressive graphics based on nothing more than imagination. I think the hockey stick falls into this category, shoddy science based on computer trickery, producing learned sounding nonsense.
I think it was Norman August who said (around 1970) that the computer was the enemy of progress. Any simulation that cannot be explained on the back of an envelope is worse than useless, it’s dangerous.