To: GailA
They hope that will happen in 2016 if it passes all its clinical trials. So the drug has not been approved by the FDA.
Yet the company is being blamed?
4 posted on
03/10/2014 10:02:04 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(I never thought anyone could make Jimmy Carter look good in comparison.)
To: Michael.SF.
I am wondering why the doctors would be recommending a drug that hasn’t been approved yet? They should know better than that.
7 posted on
03/10/2014 10:04:18 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: Michael.SF.
There is a federal law for COMPASSIONATE usage that will not effect future use in place. So why deny this 7 year old a chance at life?
8 posted on
03/10/2014 10:06:57 PM PDT by
GailA
(IF you fail to keep your promises to the Military, you won't keep them to Citizens!)
To: Michael.SF.
There are a lot of potential life saving drugs still in the FDA hoop jumping stage.
Maybe if the company and parents greased enough palms in the FDA, it will happen faster. Its the Chicago way.
30 posted on
03/11/2014 3:37:51 AM PDT by
Yorlik803
( Church/Caboose in 2016)
To: Michael.SF.
Brincidofovir Random thought - this looks like the name of an ancient Celtic hero.
31 posted on
03/11/2014 3:44:07 AM PDT by
Hardastarboard
(The question of our age is whether a majority of Americans can and will vote us all into slavery.)
To: Michael.SF.
The government can never be to blame....under a Democrat president.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson