Skip to comments.
Boeing 777 Pilots: It's Not Easy To Disable Onboard Communications (No idea)
NPR ^
| March 14, 2014
| Scott Newman
Posted on 03/14/2014 5:04:12 PM PDT by Drango
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: mountainlion
Not to cast aspersions, but there were no less than 20 people onboard that plane that worked for a computer software company.
CC
21
posted on
03/14/2014 5:34:17 PM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
To: dirtboy
A Boeing employee might know. Or other techies. The passenger list is crucial to this investigation, I think.
22
posted on
03/14/2014 5:38:43 PM PDT
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: chrisser
23
posted on
03/14/2014 5:49:25 PM PDT
by
therut
To: Drango
“That’s caused many to speculate that somebody tried to make this plane vanish,” Brumfiel says. “
And it worked. :-)
24
posted on
03/14/2014 5:49:30 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Drango
So the satellite sends out a “Hello” packet... wonder if its a general multcast type hello to all aircraft on net and each aircraft id itself in its reply..because this case is so so strange I'm wondering if someone would “spoof” that aircraft to make people think it was still in the air
25
posted on
03/14/2014 5:52:23 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
(Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
To: chrisser
I dont know if this story is accurate or not, but, could it be that any pilot who would speak to NPR possibly isnt the brightest of the bunch? I hate to say it, but it is probably the most accurate story about pilot knowledge of the communication systems on the 777. Shutting down the ACARS is not something someone could do without specific training on the 777. Boeing airplanes are pretty standard, but there are major differences in how the ACARS is set up and functions in the 767, 777, and the 747.
To: ALPAPilot
If ACARS on say a routine flight quits working or trips a breaker does the crew get any notificiation? Audible or visiual cue?
27
posted on
03/14/2014 6:15:25 PM PDT
by
Rockpile
To: Celtic Conservative
So do I. And I wouldn’t have a clue.
To: Mr Ramsbotham
I agree, none of the information that has come out about all this deviating and turning back has been absolutely confirmed by Boeing, the engine makers, the US government or the Malaysian or Chinese government, it’s all coming from “anonymous sources”.
My suspicion is that when the plane is found, it will be found near where it was supposed to be and a simple catastrophic failure caused by pilot error, mechanical failure or an old-fashioned bomb will be the explanation.
To: PotatoHeadMick
...none of the information that has come out about all this deviating and turning back has been absolutely confirmed by Boeing, the engine makers, the US government or the Malaysian or Chinese government, its all coming from anonymous sources. I believe the satellite "pinging" has been confirmed by Inmarsat.
30
posted on
03/14/2014 7:13:43 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Drango
Let me put it this way. It is strange sometimes who knows how to do what, and who doesn't. Just because someone doesn't have a certificate on their wall and a card in their pocket does not preclude the sort of intensive, almost fanatical study that will have them know a system, a piece of equipment, a program better than perhaps everyone but those who engineered it.
What these pilots know or don't only indicates that whoever turned those systems off (provided someone did) had taken enough time to do their homework and learn how, and that (at least some) pilots normally don't bother or need to learn these things. Their not knowing doesn't preclude someone else knowing, it just indicates the knowledge is apparently not common knowledge among the pilots.
31
posted on
03/14/2014 7:25:38 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: tophat9000
The transponder is shut off with a switch by pilots, the ACARS system requires a breaker to be pulled in the lower electonics bay, it reqires some knowledge.
32
posted on
03/14/2014 7:43:59 PM PDT
by
ully2
To: Drango
A very little bit of studying, it would be very easy to pull the circuit breakers of any/all comm equipment. In heavies, they are accessible by the pilot and crew.
To: Drango
Can anyone explain this? (Was a experienced pilot flying at this point or not?)
The New York Times, quoting American officials and others familiar with the investigation, said radar signals recorded by the Malaysian military appear to show the airliner climbing to 45,000 feet (about 13,700 meters), higher than a Boeing 777's approved limit, soon after it disappeared from civilian radar, and making a sharp turn to the west. The radar track then shows the plane descending unevenly to an altitude of 23,000 feet (7,000 meters), below normal cruising levels, before rising again and flying northwest over the Strait of Malacca toward the Indian Ocean, the Times reported.
To: Rokurota
It’s easy if that’s what you as a passport stealing terrorist, have been trained to do. Some terrorists pilots don’t bother learning to land or take off. Call them specialists.
35
posted on
03/14/2014 8:45:39 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(In Latin, the word sinister means left. Which is appropriate for left-wingers.)
To: Drango
Commercial aviation pilots tell NPR that they would have no idea how to disable all the systems designed to automatically communicate with ground stations, though they could probably figure it out from checklists and other documentation available aboard an aircraft...I'll bet they might be able to figure it out if they had enough motivation - say they wanted to hijack a plane - even those stupid enough to want to talk to NPR.....
To: Drango
I'm sure the systems are well protected, but isn't the B777 an all electric, software driven airplane with pilots controlling the computers that are actually controlling the airplane? Is anything completely dependent on software truly hack proof?
If you can get access to where the boxes that are and control the various systems on the airplane are located, you can turn them off by simply by disconnecting the cables hooked up to them.
Regardless, the pilots should be able to turn anything on the panel off, either by its power knob or switch or by the breaker.
If the plane crashed, there's a decent chance the ELT(s) should be broadcasting as designed unless damaged or destroyed.
Information is controlled these days, so are we, the masses, up to speed on what is actually known or are we being strung along like with most everything else on the one stream media?
37
posted on
03/14/2014 9:30:46 PM PDT
by
GBA
(Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
To: stlnative
If the pilot was pulling circuit beakers to shut off comm and nav systems to disable them, I could see him shutting off the radar altimeter. Then as he is flying, he has to rely on air data instruments. If they were not calibrated correctly, or he did not have accurate barometric pressure settings, the altimeter could be off by several hundred feet at that altitude.
To: stlnative
If the pilot was pulling circuit beakers (or hijacker)
Added.
To: Drango
from what I understand, the “pings” were from the engines, not the cockpit...Rolls Royce has it built into their engines.
But one wonders why none of the tech guys etc. didn’t manage to call home? Anyone know the technical aspects of this?
40
posted on
03/14/2014 11:26:59 PM PDT
by
LadyDoc
(liberals only love politically correct poor people)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson