Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle

Makes no sense. Police can’t keep information confidential. It is called Discovery(Brady v. Md). Why should a paid clerk be able to keep criminal information confidential but a duly appointed law Enforcement Officer can’t?
Secondly, the Judge wanted to see the information IN CAMERA. That means only the Judge sees it. Not the Defense Attorney. Why would this person Not want to show it to the Judge. Probably made up. Fraudulent. It is called Official Misconduct. Much more criminal than Contempt.


19 posted on 03/15/2014 11:15:50 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: DrDude
Why should a paid clerk be able to keep criminal information confidential but a duly appointed law Enforcement Officer can’t?

Because of the contract with the informant.

20 posted on 03/15/2014 1:07:27 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson