Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

6 Arguments Only A Liberal Could Believe
Townhall.com ^ | 3-18-2014 | John Hawkins

Posted on 03/18/2014 2:35:33 AM PDT by servo1969

"Arguing with liberals...it's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it's victorious." -- Anonymous

"If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you’ve said — unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist. In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It’s like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder." -- Ann Coulter

It's almost impossible to have any kind of meaningful discussion with a liberal because while you're trying to come up with logical points to support your position, he’s trying to come up with new ways to convince people you're Hitler. Modern liberalism has turned into a willful embrace of stupidity. It's all about setting reason and intellect aside in order to take an emotionally-satisfying position that makes a liberal feel better about himself. This is how people who are undeniably intelligent can feel good about taking brainless positions that hurt a lot of people. While liberals have emotionally blinded themselves so totally that they believe they're taking compassionate, intellectual, well-crafted stands, this is how they sound to everyone who's not a liberal.

1) Everyone who disagrees with a liberal is racist! The Tea Party? Racist! Republicans? Racist! Fox News? Racist? Black conservatives? Racist! Barack Obama's grandma? Racist! Do I think Social Security is solvent? My position on that is that "You're a racist!" What do I think about flattening the tax code? Sarah Palin is a racist! Do I like potatoes? Well, Republicans eat potatoes sometimes; so potatoes are racist! Racist, racist, racist!

2) We're all going to die because man is causing global warming! Proof? It's science! Granted, no one can explain the science that proves global warming. But, science isn't about science, it's about repeating the word “science” over and over again like a magic incantation. Science, science, sciencey, sciencey science! See? It's science and scientists agree that it's science! Why do you hate science so much? Why do you want polar bears to die? Oh, and science!

3) (Before Obamacare was passed) Everyone should support Obamacare because it will cover all of the uninsured, it'll save you money on health care, you'll get to keep your doctor and it'll be super convenient! It's going to be the greatest thing ever! (Now) Sure, Obamacare mostly insures people it knocked off of their existing insurance, it costs a lot more, you can't keep your doctor and the website is insanely difficult to deal with, but it's the greatest thing ever!

4) Guns cause crime and if we take guns away from people who haven't broken the law yet, then criminals will also not have guns somehow. Gun-free zones also protect people from criminals, who we're sure won't enter "gun-free zones" for some reason. Unless they do…. Which proves the problem is actually law abiding gun owners somehow or another. And that's why we need more and more gun laws until all the people who obey gun laws can't have guns any more, which will save us from criminals and crazy people who don't care about the law.

5) You can't expect black people to get voter ID. I mean, white guys? Sure. Hispanics? No problem. Asians and Jews? Obviously. But, have you met any black people in your life? You really think they're capable of going to a government office with the proper paperwork and coming out with identification with their name on it? These guys? Seriously? Seriously? Okay, well, right after you run across a black American who can figure out how to get his own ID, why don't we set up classrooms to teach cats how to do Algebra. Hey, Mr. Kitty, 3x + 10 + 2x = 12 + 4x? Black people getting IDs? Geeze....

6) Republicans are waging a war on women! You can tell because they oppose killing female babies and think women should buy their own birth control, just like men! Also, they're so mean to women! For example, they oppose Hillary Clinton becoming President -- obviously because she's a woman. All criticism of women from conservatives is based on gender. Not like criticism of that @%$#^ Sarah Palin, who is so incredibly, unbelievably stupid that she only managed to become a mayor, a governor, a VP candidate, put out best selling books, had a successful TV show and became a wealthy, sought-after speaker while getting married and having 5 kids. She's almost as bad as those @#$%!*$ -- Michelle Malkin, S.E. Cupp, and Dana Loesch, although a little more evil than Ann Coulter and Megyn Kelly and more of a @#%@^$%^ #@$%^&(*^ @#$%^ than Laura Ingraham and Jan Brewer! Also, conservatives call women names!


TOPICS: Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: banglist; conservative; liberal; obamacare; progessive; race; racism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: FoxInSocks

Show off!! LOL


21 posted on 03/18/2014 5:31:13 AM PDT by amigatec (The only change you will see in the next four years will be what's in your pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
The actual money was put in the general fund long ago by the Democrats and spent as fast as it was received. This was truly a case of "no trust, no fund".

Be sure never to buy into the little canard that somebody "raided the trust fund."

That was the way Social Security was designed to operate by FDR. It was a ponzi scheme by its very design...and is operating exactly the way it was supposed to.

(The above is not Pollyanna...the above simply states that it was government-sponsored theft of assets from the beginning)

22 posted on 03/18/2014 5:38:42 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
But, science isn't about science, it's about repeating the word “science” over and over again like a magic incantation. Science, science, sciencey, sciencey science!

When I read that, all I could think of was this.

23 posted on 03/18/2014 5:49:59 AM PDT by real saxophonist (More Cowbell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I disagree on one point: they don’t want Latinos to have to get ID cards either, far as I can tell. They want Mexicans voting here, because they reliably vote Democrat.


24 posted on 03/18/2014 5:51:39 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
With liberal activists, it's as futile to expect them to concede that their position is illogical as it would be to get a defense attorney to concede in court that his client is a guilty SOB, and for similar reasons.

The liberal activist may not even believe any of the stuff he's spouting, but that is irrelevant. The positions he takes are those which would result in increased government, and that government being under control of the Left. THAT is the real objective. The Leftist desires power, and will say anything he needs to say to obtain power.

25 posted on 03/18/2014 5:57:40 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
Liberals come in 2 groups: low-IQ and certifiably insane

This may be true but my advise is still;
Never underestimate the power of ignorant people in large groups.

26 posted on 03/18/2014 6:03:43 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
That was the way Social Security was designed to operate by FDR. It was a ponzi scheme by its very design...and is operating exactly the way it was supposed to.

Given that FDR and Carlo Ponzi were contemporaries, your remark may be far truer than most realize...

the infowarrior

27 posted on 03/18/2014 6:22:31 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

#2 is hilarious. I have a libinlaw that “invokes” science as a support of her viewpoints, and when I ask her to explain how “science” supports her viewpoint, she is suddenly interested in another topic.


28 posted on 03/18/2014 6:23:52 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

“Low IQ and certifiably evil, with less overlap than one might think.”

Highly concur. In the low IQ group I’d lump the
“I’m smart because I support smart people” (in group 2)
and
“I’m a good person because I support good people who want to help people” (again group 2 liars).


29 posted on 03/18/2014 6:25:57 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

Good kitty!


30 posted on 03/18/2014 6:26:31 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

My benchmark lib stated the other night “you need to force people to do the right thing”.

And my kids laughed at her. And they’re in the 9 and 7 range.


31 posted on 03/18/2014 6:27:01 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2; All

“The Soviet Union and Nazism originated with a small number of people manipulating low-IQ masses, many of whom never saw the folly of it until they saw the death camps/gulags years later.”

Alexander Solzenitzen documented that even after many of the lower Party members were unjustly sent to the camps, and were starving to death, they still supported Stalin and Communism, saying that “Well, I am sure that it is all serving a greater purpose of the government somehow.”

It is a blind faith in government as god.


32 posted on 03/18/2014 6:34:02 AM PDT by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
I had a conversation the other day with a neighbor who claims to be “middle-of-the-road”

Heed the wise advice offered in Proverbs 26:4
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.

Advice not to argue with an idiot is sound advice. Only take the decision to argue with an idiot after accepting that someone watching will not be able to tell whom the idiot is.

More wise advice: Proverbs 14:7
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge.

33 posted on 03/18/2014 6:35:13 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Well, this potentially wondeeful program has been gutted and delayed dozens of times by its sponsor, in an effort to keep the reality of its intrusive, expensive stupidity from the minds of voters.

Was your liberal "friend" aware of this?

34 posted on 03/18/2014 6:37:55 AM PDT by OldPossum ("It's" is the contraction of "it" and "is"; think about ITS implications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

He is aware of the problems with Obamacare, but like most of his ilk, the good intentions are what matters. (As in the “war on poverty.”)

I asked him if he thought it was okay that Obama lied repeatedly to get this thing passed, (”If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.”) His response, again, was the typical liberal knee-jerk, end justifies the means excuse: “Well, he had to do that in order to get it passed.” In other words, the good intentions of getting insurance, and therefore healthcare services for the millions of under-served poor are reason enough to lie in order to accomplish this. The fact that it wasn’t accomplished, and, based on even a cursory study of the plan, can never be accomplished by Obamacare is irrelevant. He WANTED to get healthcare for everyone. Liberals WANT to end poverty. Unfortunately, the policies they use to achieve their desired ends have all been utter failures.


35 posted on 03/18/2014 7:00:39 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (lib-pocrisy: requiring photo ID at a march protesting photo IDs for voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
I do not believe I will receive any Social Security income. Will probably receive something called Social Security. But it will be part of a con game where the money comes out of one of my pockets and part of it goes into the other.

Your Social Security check will be bigger than ever! Bigger than your wildest dreams! Except, there will be deductions for your fair share of health care costs, etc, totaling more than your check, so pay this amount now due.
36 posted on 03/18/2014 8:50:14 AM PDT by Colinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

And you choose to associate with such a person? Aren’t you afraid that some of those jibes of irrationality will rub off on you? :)


37 posted on 03/18/2014 9:20:58 AM PDT by OldPossum ("It's" is the contraction of "it" and "is"; think about ITS implications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Agreed. Very feminine. No wonder they are all about feminine behaviors like abortion and homosexuality.


38 posted on 03/18/2014 9:43:27 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

lol


39 posted on 03/18/2014 10:38:04 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

The high IQ certifiably willfully stupid are the worst. They remind me of a comment that “Maude” made to “Archie Bunker” once on the old All In The Family show. Maude was the liberal but her retort to Archie was priceless, following some comment made by Archie she looked at him with total contempt and replied, “Still fighting mental HEALTH, I see.”
Most liberals actually seem to fight against mental health with a tenacity that would make a Marine proud. Of course, in their view, they are the only ones who understand reality, the rest of us are Archie Bunker.


40 posted on 03/18/2014 11:44:06 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson