Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't enough about the science behind this, but it sounds good.
1 posted on 03/19/2014 4:28:24 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

Courtesy ping, even though you have gone to the GREAT ZOT in the afterlife.


2 posted on 03/19/2014 4:29:32 PM PDT by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Thorium looks very good, for now.

I'm with the author. Good luck to them.

3 posted on 03/19/2014 4:30:17 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

“I don’t know enough” that is.


4 posted on 03/19/2014 4:32:06 PM PDT by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

More on this subject:

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=228863


7 posted on 03/19/2014 4:35:24 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Basically, a ton of coal contains a certain amount of thorium (which is why the Greenies get their undies in a bunch about "radioactivity" from burning coal).

The energy contained in the thorium is about 10-15 times the energy you get from burning the coal.

What we as a country should be doing is processing the coal for the thorium and producing electricity with the thorium. Then, we could use some of the energy produced to take the processed ton of coal and squeeze it to produce petroleum product, like the Germans did in World War II.

The thorium nuclear process is liquified molten salt. This molten salt gives off heat. If you have a problem, the system has a cooled plug which will melt, and release the molten salt into a containment vessel. It then solidifies, with no danger of a runaway reaction.

The only real problem with molten radioactive salts is that they're highly corrosive, and give you problems in that area.

9 posted on 03/19/2014 4:38:50 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
The thorium blueprints gathered dust in the archives until retrieved and published by former Nasa engineer Kirk Sorensen. The US largely ignored him: China did not.

Mr Jiang visited the Oak Ridge labs and obtained the designs – entirely legitimately – after reading an article in the American Scientist extolling thorium.

16 posted on 03/19/2014 5:07:28 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I’m interested to see what the continual processing of the thorium radioactive waste will cost. Conventional nuclear reactor waste products don’t require continually processing. It can just be stored.


27 posted on 03/19/2014 7:24:05 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

The molten salt reactor can be fueled from the so called “reactor waste” stored in cooling pools. LWR types with clad fuel burn at best 5% of fuel content before reaching accumulated damage limits. Strip the fuel and actinides from the ceramic base, and dissolve into a carrier salt. Now the fuel can be purified as needed. Estimates place available fuel so obtained at 75 to 150 years supply. Plenty of time to work up to a thorium breeder.

The chemical reprocessing of the fuel onsite is where the Chinese are on a steep learning curve. Reactors in operation generate waste which drain vitality as a parasite does a host. Materials processing will need to be accomplished at the molten temperature of the salt. The processing will resemble aluminum extraction thru electrolysis of molten ore. The engineering details to do this are only now addressed.


37 posted on 03/19/2014 8:08:18 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Screw that. We want our oil and natural gas and fracking and strip mining and conventional nook plants (with Fukashima meltdowns) that create highly radioactive waste that lasts for thousands of years. Big Oil will never allow thorium plants in the USSR.


45 posted on 03/19/2014 9:07:09 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Libs/greenies already fiercely oppose it. They say it’s not economically feasible.


50 posted on 03/19/2014 10:58:40 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I have to smirk at the phrase “fossil fuel hegemony”. That thorium is a lot older than the oil, gas, and coal the greenies whine about.


53 posted on 03/20/2014 3:24:37 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Let’s face it. Western culture as we knew it is on the decline. There was a time when The United States took the lead in technological innovation.

Now we have Jessie Jackson insisting that affirmative action be implemented in areas where only the best and brightest would gravitate to. China is going to overtake us in so many areas. Sad, but true.


106 posted on 03/20/2014 1:04:46 PM PDT by CodeJockey (Christian, Freeper, Tea Party Member, Bitter Clinger, Creepy White Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

bfl


146 posted on 03/21/2014 5:00:12 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson