Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Whenifhow

This gives 12% of the population 60% of the vote.


17 posted on 03/23/2014 8:44:22 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TheOldLady
This gives 12% of the population 60% of the vote.

It's now the inverse of 3/5ths.

49 posted on 03/23/2014 9:47:14 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TheOldLady

Why not? They already commit over 60% of the crime in this country.


50 posted on 03/23/2014 9:47:29 AM PDT by gop4lyf (Are we no longer in that awkward time? Or is it still too early?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TheOldLady

If everyone did it, it would actually be higher than that, wouldn’t it?

Those extra 5 votes wipe-out 60% of the opposition vote.


69 posted on 03/23/2014 10:52:39 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TheOldLady
This gives 12% of the population 60% of the vote.

It's framed in terms of "rights." This woman (quoted in another article) said she'd vote as many times as she could to protect the "right" of BO "to be seated as President." Her right to vote as many times as she wanted, BO's right to have access to the office of POTUS if he wanted. Once the argument is framed in terms of rights and reparations, what sort of reasoning can you use to combat that?

88 posted on 03/23/2014 2:41:16 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson