Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MALAYSIAN AUTHORITIES: The Plane Crashed With No Survivors
Business Insider ^ | 03/24/2014 | Pamela Engel

Posted on 03/24/2014 7:19:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Malaysian authorities are assuming beyond a reasonable doubt that the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has been lost in the Southern Indian Ocean. NBC News reports that Malaysia Airlines sent a text message to the relatives of the 239 people who were on board the plane saying "we have to assume beyond any reasonable doubt that MH370 has been lost and that none of those on board have survived. ... We must not accept all evidence suggests the plane went down in the Southern Indian Ocean."

Malaysia Prime Minister Najib Razak announced the new developments at a press conference on Monday.

"This evening, I was briefed by representatives from the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch … they informed me that [satellite company] Inmarsat … has been performing further calculations on the data using a type of analysis never before used in an investigation of this sort," he said. "They have been able to shed more light on MH370."

Razak continued: "[Investigators] have concluded that MH370 flew along the southern corridor and that its last position was in the middle of the Indian Ocean west of Perth, [Australia]. This is a remote location far from any possible landing sites. It is therefore with deep sadness and regret that I must inform you that according to this new data, Flight MH370 ended in the southern Indian Ocean."

The U.S. Navy is now flying a black box detector to the area in hopes of recovering the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder. A U.S. Navy plane flying over the possible debris field detected two or three faint radar hits, according to NBC News reporter Bill Neely.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: malaysianairlines; malaysiapresser; mh370; mh370presser; planecrash; rehash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: milagro

Ditto that.


21 posted on 03/24/2014 7:50:53 AM PDT by Jaded (Really? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mtrott
You got that right. No way would I fly on any of those airlines in that area.

Good call.

They put lithium batteries in the belly compartments (as they did on this flight, though I don't think that was the cause of the crash). We don't do that in the states, at least not on passenger aircraft. It shows they have less regard for safety.

22 posted on 03/24/2014 7:51:29 AM PDT by zipper ("The Second Amendment IS my carry permit!" -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

RIP May God be with their loved ones who are coping with this horror.


23 posted on 03/24/2014 7:52:26 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The original Inmarsat analysis described just two possible routes for the doomed aircraft. The Northern route flew into military radar coverage that would have, IMHO, resulted in the detection of the aircraft with a 100% probability. The Southern route flew over a huge area free of any radar coverage.

Knowing nothing else one could safely speculate that the missing aircraft flew the Southern route.

Although I have not seen any details about the new Inmarsat analysis it seems obvious that the new results have eliminated the possibility of the Northern route.

I think this aspect of the fate of MH370 is settled. The events preceding the turn to the South remain a mystery.


24 posted on 03/24/2014 7:52:38 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“Not really. There’s no reasonable proof of their claim at all. Just trying to sweep it under the rug and move on.”

All that statement means that it has been a long time since the flight went missing, we cant find it, so it must have crashed in the ocean.


25 posted on 03/24/2014 7:54:24 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dforest
No, unless someone can come up with some real evidence, conspiracy theories will get even more rampant.

Keerect! I draw your collective attention to the Amelia Earhart event.

26 posted on 03/24/2014 7:58:13 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Yes, and Inmarsat has consistently said that 9M-MRO flew off into the south Indian Ocean. They have said this since the 10th.


27 posted on 03/24/2014 7:59:48 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Try this thread

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3136472/posts


28 posted on 03/24/2014 8:00:19 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
...unless someone can come up with some real evidence, conspiracy theories will get even more rampant.

Paging Bob Ballard! Paging Bob Ballard!

29 posted on 03/24/2014 8:02:02 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Character matters for those who understand the concept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

“The satellite data didn’t come from the Malaysian government. It came from Inmarsat .”

I am aware of that. But I still don’t trust the Malays. No confirmed flight debris yet exists, and I am still not 100% convinced this Inmarsat data is that infallible as to the location of the plane. Maybe it is though. Plus, the Malays have a financial interest in getting this behind them. If true, this eliminates the catastrophic fire theory, as the plane would not likely fly 7 hours with a significant fire.


30 posted on 03/24/2014 8:04:13 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

I thought they said it flew either south OR north on those arcs.


31 posted on 03/24/2014 8:05:17 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

I saw data from them that said there were two possible arcs ...one to the north and one to the south.


32 posted on 03/24/2014 8:12:39 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

That information has been discredited now.


33 posted on 03/24/2014 8:13:45 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I wonder if Inmarsat checked for a Dopler shift to detect the direction of the plane.


34 posted on 03/24/2014 8:14:03 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The “Malaysian Authorities” said that? Whew! I was afraid the people were all dead or something.


35 posted on 03/24/2014 8:18:00 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/inmarsat-says-told-malaysia-of-indian-ocean-possibility-on-march-12

They actually ruled out the North arc very early.

People didn’t want to hear it...


36 posted on 03/24/2014 8:21:10 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
"We must not accept all evidence suggests the plane went down in the Southern Indian Ocean."

Look at how long it has taken the Malaysian PM to accept the Inmarsat data while everyone else has been searching for their plane where all the evidence suggests???

He's still not convinced --

37 posted on 03/24/2014 8:27:07 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: milagro

’ based on info from the UK’

That from the people with the hockey stick theories?


38 posted on 03/24/2014 8:27:26 AM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I think this is proforma. The ‘mystery’ status of the plane can't be sustained forever in the legal world.
A protocol must be in place that says that, after some many days, the company and the governments’ have to wind down this ‘one of our aircraft is missing phase and move on to the ‘file claims and call off the search’ phase. It is being framed in an obscure way that attaches no blame and causes as little grief to the loved ones as possible. It doesn't describe the event in one way or another...
39 posted on 03/24/2014 8:36:05 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

Unknown historical conditions in the range of hundreds of thousands of years ago, supposedly running up to the present is different from the science of dealing with things that are measurable and verifiable TODAY.

The very same scientist can be totally wrong on theoretical and past data based upon assumptions that cannot be proven — and perfectly right for things that are “testable” and proven for today.

You have to keep those two different kinds of categories separate in your mind and understanding.


40 posted on 03/24/2014 9:36:31 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson