Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Net energy imports in 2013 lowest in more than 20 years
Energy Information Administration ^ | APRIL 2, 2014 | Energy Information Administration

Posted on 04/02/2014 1:09:41 PM PDT by thackney

Total U.S. net imports of energy, measured in terms of energy content, declined in 2013 to their lowest level in more than two decades. Growth in the production of oil and natural gas displaced imports and supported increased petroleum product exports, driving most of the decline. A large drop in energy imports together with a smaller increase in energy exports led to a 19% decrease in net energy imports from 2012 to 2013.

Total energy imports declined faster—down 9% from 2012 to 2013—than in the previous year, while export growth slowed. Crude oil production grew 15%, about the same pace as in 2012, which led imports of crude oil to decrease by 12%, accounting for much of the overall decline in imports. These data reflect only the energy content of energy trade. For more information on the value of energy trade, see a previous series of Today in Energy articles that examines energy trade in the context of overall U.S. trade in goods and services.

Preliminary 2013 data for U.S. total energy consumption, production, and trade, now available in the Monthly Energy Review, reflect the cumulative effect of changes in energy markets over the year. Other highlights include:

- Total U.S. primary energy consumption increased 2.4% after declining in 2011 and 2012, with renewable energy providing the largest percentage increase.

- Primary energy consumption increased in all end-use sectors. Residential sector consumption increased the most, and transportation sector consumption increased the least.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anwr; energy; hydrocarbons; imports; keystonexl; opec


1 posted on 04/02/2014 1:09:41 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks thackney.


2 posted on 04/02/2014 1:16:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Obama is now making Jimmy Carter look like Attila the Hun. /focus/news/3138768/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Wow, B0 Soebarkah fixed the energy problem.
Now, what’s next on his list?


3 posted on 04/02/2014 2:12:12 PM PDT by Zuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Nuclear Energy: Cleaner, Safer and Made in America
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aoAf-wWies


4 posted on 04/05/2014 7:00:21 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

Nuclear is good, but essentially meaningless for transportation, the reason for most of our imports.

http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/flow/total_energy.pdf

http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/flow/css_2012_energy.pdf


5 posted on 04/05/2014 6:05:28 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sure, but it could replace coal.


6 posted on 04/06/2014 12:19:08 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

and you can use the heat to produce liquid fuel.


7 posted on 04/06/2014 12:21:16 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

But we export, not import coal.

This article was about reducing our net energy imports.


8 posted on 04/06/2014 11:00:50 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Use of low cost nuclear will reduce the cost of energy for electricity, and reduce the cost of shale oil production. It will as well make it possible to produce liquid (i.e hydrocarbon) fuel.´It “only” requires an administration that understands what to do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayIyiVua8cY
9 posted on 04/06/2014 12:31:49 PM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
low cost nuclear

Let me know when you actually find real low cost nuclear. It has been talked about for many decades. But currently, it is about twice the cost of combined cycle natural gas.

10 posted on 04/06/2014 2:28:34 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson