[P-Marlowe]

If a lawyer had billions of physical pieces of evidence that can be linked in a logical unassailable manner, would that suffice?

Every piece of that evidence is fully and wholly consistent with a theory of intelligent design.

[freedumb2003]

>>Every piece of that evidence is fully and wholly consistent with a theory of intelligent design.<<

ID is not a Scientific Theory by any definition (again, remember my example of not understanding terms).

It is a fun piece of philosophy but does not rise to a Scientific Theory until you physically introduce us to the Designer, who we may interrogate. Not an entity in thought, but a corporeal being.

ID is just a satisfying emotional middleground.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

Every piece of evidence is fully and wholly consistent with Last Thursdayism.

But neither ID or LT are useful in predicting what will happen going forward.