[freedumb2003]

>>Freedumb2003, you are too defensive and lose your objectivity.<<

Explaining science to laypeople isn’t defensive. It is education.

>>Or you simply are a liberal.<<

I see it didn’t take long for the ad homimum to come out when you didn’t address a single scientific argument I made.

Translation: “I don’t know science and don’t understand your arguments, FD, so I will call you a poopy-head.”

*sigh*

Lurkers now now there are Conservatives who know what science is. And, sadly, those who do not.

I am done here.

[ifinnegan]

You don’t explain science. You defend spaghetti monster.

Big difference

You actually provide a false impression of science.

Are you claiming to be a biologist?

[ifinnegan]

“I am done here.”

So you come on and make silly and bombastic empty claims.

Make scientists look like pompous buffoons, thus sullying and besmirching the repution of science and scientists.

Then you bail.

Sounds about right.

I’m actually interested in you specifically stating “every single criteria for a Scientific Theory.”

That’d be cool.