>>So you come on and make silly and bombastic empty claims.
Make scientists look like pompous buffoons, thus sullying and besmirching the repution of science and scientists.
Then you bail.
Sounds about right.<<
There is always one of you here.
I speak science, you speak nonsense.
No one as done a single scientific refutation of my arguments. No has even bothered to walk through how TToE fails as a Scientific Theory (hint: You have to know what a ScientififcTheory IS to do that — so far no takers).
My point is to let OUTSIDERS know there are Conservatives who understand science.
I can do nothing with the wooden-headed and willfully ignorant.
I tried 4 years ago and I learned it is pointless.
You aren’t worth it if you won’t be educated. I won’t risk myself on your ignorant behalf.
More evasion.
You are all sizzle and no steak.
I don’t think you know anything about science. You’ve never said anything to indicate it.
You posture.
You can’t back up your words.
You see ghosts where there are none.
I for one do not like fakers like you besmirching my profession by using it for non-scientific goals and interests.
You made a statement. Can you back it up?
I’m actually interested in you specifically stating “every single criteria for a Scientific Theory.”
Provide something solid and tangible.
I think you can.