Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley

Do you see how inconsistent you are?

You just agreed that Newton’s Law is valid for anything above the nano scale, but you can’t fathom that the theory of evolution is valid if you don’t try to apply it to first life.


72 posted on 04/06/2014 10:37:26 AM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Go_Raiders
You just agreed that Newton’s Law is valid for anything above the nano scale, but you can’t fathom that the theory of evolution is valid if you don’t try to apply it to first life.

The problem with the hypothesis of evolution is that it is untested and unproven, and is not scientifically valid over ANY range. It is the complete lack of any reliable evidence for the hypothesis of evolution that is the issue.

The Scientific Method is only valid across a particular range of inquiries. Science does not apply unless a hypothesis is tested by repeatable and repeated experiments which clearly prove the hypothesis to be true.

Since no experiment has ever been performed to prove ANY version of evolution, and no experiment has ever been repeated by independent teams under varying conditions in different locations, evolution remains only a hypothesis -- a proposed possibility.

No matter how you define evolution, it has never been tested by any experiment under the disciplines of the Scientific Method.

Really, evolution is no more than superstition, like the idea that dirty rags spontaneously turn into rats. That was the superstition before the development of the Scientific Method.

But it gets worse. The Scientific Method requires the formulation of an experiment that is CAPABLE of testing the hypothesis as true or false.

How can you test the hypothesis of evolution?

Remember: Even if we observed one species transforming into another species, that still would not tell us that that is what happened in the past.

So, let's say we want to know if a Pharoah 5,000 years ago had eggs for breakfast on the third Tuesday (our terminology today) of the fourth month of the year.

How would you design an experiment to test whether the Pharoah had eggs for breakfast 5,000 years ago?

Clearly you cannot. There is no experiment that can be designed or performed to tell us what the Pharoah had for breakfast 5,000 years ago.

But that is what the origin of life is like. In fact, that is what the origin of human beings is like also. At some point in time there was the first human being. That happened ONLY ONCE.

Even if we could transform a monkey into a human being, that would not tell us that this what happened the first time.

So, how would you design an experiment capable of testing evolution true or false?

What would that experiment look like?

Remember: It has to be repeated by other independent teams in different places under varying conditions. So what experiment could prove evolution -- ANY version of evolution -- true or false?
73 posted on 04/06/2014 4:58:02 PM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson