I love that all the known Obot-Trolls are responding to me. This is a point I’ve been trying to make with the Mal-Val crowd. No known Obot-Troll ever, EVER challenges their bizarre theory. Instead, they have to make-believe (as indeed their entire theory is make-believe) that staunch conservative birthers—diehard birthers, no less—are Obot trolls. That tells you what you need to know about Mal-Val.
Now, dear Obot Troll, lets try to get our facts straight. The born-in-Kenya/out-of-Africa book was not entitled Dreams. How many times do I have to correct you Obama-lovers on this point? It’s simple enough. Obama was recruited to write a book that hinged on his Kenyan birth. He accepted a six figure advance on said book. He choomed it all away and wrote nothing—squat. [Which comes as no surprise to anyone who’s ever actually examined his writing. It sucks beyond all possible belief on the paragraph level. He couldn’t have written a coherent book if his life depended on it.]
So, having failed to write the born-in-Kenya book, Obama then accepted a second large advance. He choomed this one too. Michelle finally took matters into her own hands, gathered all the material—a “trunkload”, as recorded—and dropped it all on Ayers. He wrote an entirely different book. A book of fiction. A book of lies.
So now, Mr. Obot, if you can’t even keep your books straight, why should I bother with you? I’ve got less and less time and patience for Obots. Your guy has wrecked it all. He’s an incompetent leftist radical who runs on hate and denial. He’s a disaster. Why do you shill for him? Why not find an Obot site, where you’ll be more at home?
Video recreation of the moment that CpnHook realized he was a liberal on a conservative site:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O1hM-k3aUY
Right. Because it's just that: a bizarre theory. I suppose I could delve into the threads which dredge up lots of old photos as people give opinion who looks more like whom. Some here seem mesmerized by that. It's just not my thing. (I didn't delve much into the "Fuddy had her death staged (or was she killed?) by stealth ninja divers" threads either.)
Instead, they have to make-believe (as indeed their entire theory is make-believe) that staunch conservative birthers—diehard birthers, no less—are Obot trolls.
In other words, they try to paint you as an Obot, in the same manner you try to paint me as an Obot, when the reality is that Birtherism isn't a left-right, Conservative-Liberal issue.
The born-in-Kenya/out-of-Africa book was not entitled Dreams. How many times do I have to correct you Obama-lovers on this point? It’s simple enough. Obama was recruited to write a book that hinged on his Kenyan birth.
And that book didn't get written along those lines, right? Now, let us ask what might be a prime reason why the book concept you're suggesting this agent was pitching didn't get written from the "born in Kenya" angle. Here's an obvious answer: because BHO II wasn't born in Kenya!! And proof of that is found in the year-prior media reports (Times, Post, Tribune) stating that the President of the HLR was born in Hawaii.
Why do you shill for him?
I don't. Though I do criitque the very flawed Birther theories. There's a difference between being anti-Birther and pro-Obama (though Birthers seem to continuously conflate these concepts).
Why not find an Obot site, where you’ll be more at home?
Birtherism is a minority view even on F.R. I'm finding plenty of like-minded persons here.
(And, btw, my Feb. 4 prediction to you that the CCP would kick the can down the road from March towards the summer is proving correct.)