Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hey dumbasses. The "catastrophe" would be listening to you asshats tell us what's best for us. The un is a waste of our tax dollars and the next conservative candidate(if you can actually find one) who declares any and all contracts, treaties and dealing with the un null and void would be #1 on my to vote for list. Boot their useless HQ out of the country. See how well they do without us propping them up.
1 posted on 04/13/2014 5:20:52 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.

3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


2 posted on 04/13/2014 5:22:55 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

When are these asshats going to move back into mud huts? That would cut down on emissions. These fascists jet around in business class on our dime. Then tell the proles to take the bus. Totalitarian history repeating itself here.


3 posted on 04/13/2014 5:26:13 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
yap-yap-yap-yap-yap-yap-yap-yap
4 posted on 04/13/2014 5:39:43 AM PDT by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
IPCC recommends 'massive shift' to green energy to avoid catastrophe stuff our pockets and those of our cronies with cash

Corrected headline.

5 posted on 04/13/2014 5:41:50 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

IPCC is controlled by idiots.


6 posted on 04/13/2014 5:48:46 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

“...the United Nations reports today.”

Don’t need to read any further.

Just sayin’


8 posted on 04/13/2014 5:50:08 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This is so cute. Ipcc thinks they are still relevant. Talk about a boy who cried wolf. :-D


9 posted on 04/13/2014 5:54:11 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This is so cute. Ipcc thinks they are still relevant. Talk about a boy who cried wolf. :-D


10 posted on 04/13/2014 5:54:32 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Double FK the IPCC AND the entire UN!


14 posted on 04/13/2014 6:53:59 AM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Hey, IPPC, tell it to China.


15 posted on 04/13/2014 7:01:39 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Clean air allows more sunlight to get through, leading to global warming. If you want to cool the earth, we need more cloud cover or more pollution.


16 posted on 04/13/2014 7:27:28 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (Starve the RINOs: Not one dollar, not one vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Innovation comes from science not legislation. If cleaner energy is the goal why do our super brilliant master’s simply not invent something rather than spend decades trying to destroy advanced nations?


17 posted on 04/13/2014 7:37:23 AM PDT by The Toll (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Great idea, except the current state of “green technologies” makes the idea of any significant shift to these systems not just impractical and economically disastrous, they are physically impossible. I’m an engineer by temperament, training, and long experience. That means I have a pragmatic streak and a bent for numbers. The numbers just don’t work out. Green energy is a great idea, I’m 100% behind it - when it is ready. It is not ready yet.


19 posted on 04/13/2014 8:36:55 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Communication Dilemmas #1: Wishing Death on People Without Losing Them Read more here Here is the opening paragraph

Part of being a science communicator is hoping a natural disaster kills as many members of the audience as possible, as soon as possible, with as much media exposure as possible. As a communicator myself, I’d like nothing better than for thousands of middle-class white people to die in an extreme weather event—preferably one with global warming’s fingerprints on it—live on cable news. Tomorrow.

This person is seriously insane.

20 posted on 04/13/2014 9:12:21 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
The entrepreneurs and crony capitalists in FedGov't subsided green industries live and die by how much the average Joe buys into IPCC global warming propaganda.

OMG! paychecks are at stake!!!!!

Think about all the useless eater EPA drones who will be out of a job without this incessant global warming propaganda. This drum beat designed to brainwash people. Millions of other Govt workers could lose their paychecks, Dittos for alleged climate scientists in universities sucking on the Federal Guvmint teat

22 posted on 04/13/2014 9:48:45 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pride in the USA

26 posted on 04/13/2014 10:07:29 AM PDT by lonevoice (We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

There actually is only type of energy that would meet their goals. It would also likely garner support from a broad spectrum of society because it would actually lower energy costs for everybody.

It’s only problem is that the previous iterations of the power plants using this technology were a flawed design given a de facto monopoly by the US government. Compounded by high profile failures of the flawed design prompting widespread public fear. All completely predictable, but a few bribes from lobbyists for GE and Westinghouse papered that over and to this day, we have no coherent energy policy as a result.

The technology is nuclear, of course. Clean, zero carbon, affordable and safe. Using thorium molten salt reactors, they can be fail proof and even convert previously ‘unusable’ nuclear waste into fuel.

You will know the IPCC and their ilk are serious about carbon when they go all in for nuclear. Until then, it is safe to assume that all they want to do is tax industrialized nations so they can skim their personal fortunes off the top.


28 posted on 04/13/2014 2:05:41 PM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Laz recommends ‘massive shift’ of money from the IPCC to avoid serial lying.


35 posted on 04/13/2014 5:20:16 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson