Is it folly for me to look toward the Constitution to attempt to find support for Cliven Bundy and to find support for opposing the federal ownership of lands in Nevada? Is it as simple as a moral right versus moral wrong?
I find myself wanting to justify Cliven Bundy’s actions legally. Is that necessary?
These lands should be state lands, homesteaded off or sold off. Constitutionally. The fascist federal government is acting tyrannically when they use corrupt, bankrupting policies to try to force these families off the land they homesteaded, settled and worked for over 100 years. End of story.
And, as I posted before, it’s definitely a plan. They did the same thing to miners, loggers, oilmen, farmers, water users, and even recreational users. The Marxist/fascists, progressives, environmentalists, etc, are trying to lock up all public land and waters for their own greedy devices. And it’s not just federal “public” land. They’re now controlling how you use state public land and private property, even to the point of confiscating it.