Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GilesB

RE: Nevada grazing law says that Bundy, by historic use, has a grazing easement on the land, regardless of who owns the dirt.

OK, that’s Nevada law, what does Federal Law say? And which law trumps which in this country according to the constitution?


31 posted on 04/16/2014 10:15:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Nevada law trumps. It is within their borders, their laws regarding real estate and grazing rights and water rights etc. are THE law. The feds have no jurisdiction. To verify this, ask your self why the BLM charges grazers “management fees” instead of rent.


40 posted on 04/16/2014 10:26:26 AM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"OK, that’s Nevada law, what does Federal Law say?"

Its right here:

Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"

51 posted on 04/16/2014 10:36:03 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
OK, that’s Nevada law, what does Federal Law say? And which law trumps which in this country according to the constitution?

You are likely looking for the answer that Federal law trumps states' laws. But find me a passage in the Constitution that allows for the Fed to make laws regarding these issues?
72 posted on 04/16/2014 11:08:12 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson