Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

No, actually the law is on Bundy’s side - meaning the written law. Apparently the legal system is on the fed’s side. But as written, Bundy owns a grazing easement on the land. The BLM can only charge a “management fee”, if they do not manage properly, and he refuses to pay for a job they aren’t doing, it does not give them the right to tamper with his easement.

Bundy needs better lawyers.


47 posted on 04/16/2014 10:30:42 AM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: GilesB
Apparently the legal system is on the fed’s side. But as written, Bundy owns a grazing easement on the land. The BLM can only charge a “management fee”, if they do not manage properly, and he refuses to pay for a job they aren’t doing, it does not give them the right to tamper with his easement.

That is what he has claimed but I don't think the courts have agreed with him.

Bundy needs better lawyers.

Maybe

55 posted on 04/16/2014 10:47:11 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson