Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rjsimmon
Bundy is correct. The BLM illegally annexed State land.

Never happened. The land was federal land under the Treaty that ended the Mexican War, which was before Nevada ever became a state. When Nevada was admitted to the Union, it disclaimed any interest in federal lands within its borders.

77 posted on 04/16/2014 11:11:54 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

Well what should those lands then be called? They aren’t Nevada, then. Somebody tell the map makers please!


80 posted on 04/16/2014 11:13:36 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

One could spend their whole life studying how all this came to be, it is not as simple as what you state. Federal land except for specific purposes was supposed to be turned back to the states, all of the states as far as I know. There were many steps with different outcomes, but way back the theory was that the federal government only had claim on land for specific purposes.

I do not pretend to be an expert but I think to really understand all of this requires digging and I found this interesting video that leads one to many places (documents, congressional and state actions, etc.) seems to be a treasure map to learning more about all this...

http://okanoganrlc.wordpress.com/2014/01/15/ken-ivory-explains-the-history-of-flpma-pilt-and-srs/


109 posted on 04/16/2014 12:42:17 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson