Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy; BillyBoy

Exactly. But I’d tend to go with 50%+1. I think it’s important the nominee have the support of a majority of the party voters. Also, even more important than that, EVERY state needs to have CLOSED primaries, period.


33 posted on 04/24/2014 4:23:15 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy
>> EVERY state needs to have CLOSED primaries, period. <<

What floors me is how many voters claim to be "registered Republicans" in states like Illinois that have no party registration and they let you pick which party ballot you want when you show up for the primary election. They may have a record of voting in GOP primaries, but they're not "registered" with that party.

Liberals particularly like to claim to be "registered Republicans" whenever they're trying to sway the GOP to move left: "I'm a registered Republican and I support gay marriage". Sure, and I'm a registered member of MENSA.

The other one that gets me is voters who request "punch cards" and demand to know where's the one button they can press to "vote a straight party ticket". This was going on rampantly during Pat Quinn's stolen election over Bill Brady in 2010. These people claim to have voted in every election, but somehow failed to notice that punch cards were eliminated in Illinois in 2002 (thanks to the infamous Bush-Gore battle in Florida) and one-punch straight ticket voting was eliminated way back in 1980 or something along those lines. When the dummies find out they actually have to find the D candidate on the ballot manually, they just punch RAT for Governor or President, leave the rest of their ballot blank, and then cast their vote. Gotta love lazy RAT voting zombies.

Polls show the number of voters who identify as "Independents" is at all-time high, but it sure doesn't seem that way whenever people up on election. For every voter who hates to choose a partisan ballot, there's five more claiming to be a registered member of one and demanding a straight-party ticket.

35 posted on 04/24/2014 4:34:53 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Looking at the weather lately, I could really use some 'global warming' right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy; BillyBoy

“Also, even more important than that, EVERY state needs to have CLOSED primaries, period.”


Agreed. I would posit that it is a violation of the First Amendment to prevent citizens that organize themselves as political parties to be able to determine who their standard-bearer will be in an election.


38 posted on 04/24/2014 5:14:13 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson