Posted on 04/27/2014 3:08:43 PM PDT by SMGFan
You’ve had exactly nothing to say that is at all accurate or pertinent when it comes to electoral politics in Utah circa this century.
I don’t care what your beef with Mormonism is or about your “facts”, go post your bilge on a religion thread where someone might give a damn.
It’s the old...at least mormonS aren’t flying into buildings argument.
Love has a good chance of wining, however if her opposition is a white man mormon she will lose.
See post #170, it’s just the way it is.
Yeah, that must be it.
Again, you should return in November to gloat about how those heavily Democrat Mormons proved you right once again and elected Democrat Owens over Mia Love. Of course, when Love wins with over 60%, you’ll just say that it “proves” that you were correct all along, or something.
Everything you've posted is exactly right.
These facts are writings of mormon leaders or direct quote from their ‘religious books’.
In Utah mormonISM is politics.
You must have missed the post were I said Love should win, now take your deranged posts somewhere else.
He opponent is White, male, and a FELLOW Mormon. And yet She has close to a 100% chance of winning and winning EASILY at that. It’s not gonna be close buddy.
I WILL ping you to the thread with the election results to show you that you don’t know what you are talking about, and I will rub it in your face in it. I look forward to reading the lame excuse you will come up to explain why you were wrong.
Like I said I don’t give a damn about Mormonism or why you don’t like it. What I can’t stand is people talking out of their butts when it comes to politics.
You are seriously deranged.
Go away and pester someone else.
YOU initiated conversation with me, I merely responded to you. I did not and do not want to talk to you! Good day!
“Love has a good chance of wining, however if her opposition is a white man mormon she will lose.”
First of all, Love is a Mormon, so she probably won’t be doing any “wining,” or “beering” for that matter. (Maybe dropping out of school after the 8th grade wasn’t such a good idea for you after all.)
Second, her Democrat opponent *is* a white, male Mormon. So, again, please return in November to gloat over how every single election analyst was wrong and only you know “the way it is.” This isn’t complicated: the Democrat Owens is white, male and a Mormon, and Mia Love is a black female (and a Mormon); those are facts. So, by the immutable laws of Mormon voting that you have discovered, Owens surely will win. You shouldn’t be using weasel words such as “if her opponent is a white man (sic) Mormon (sic)” then Love will lose; just state your electoral prediction based solely on Mia Love’s sex and race (because that’s “the way it is”), and be man enough to return in November.
(Why “the way it is” didn’t apply when Love trounced her white, male, Mormon opponents in the GOP conventions in 2012 and 2014, and why the LDS church that dictates how Mormons must vote decided to tell 49% of them to vote for Matheson and another 49% of them to vote for Love, just to ensure a 0.3% margin of victory, is beyond me, but then again I’m not as knowledgeable about electoral MoRmOnIsM as you are.)
“You must have missed the post were I said Love should win”
I must have missed it because I was too busy reading your more recent post #182, in which you wrote:
“Love has a good chance of wining, however if her opposition is a white man mormon she will lose.
See post #170, it’s just the way it is.”
As I just posted, her Democrat opponent *is* a white, male Mormon. So please tell me how to interpret your statement as “Mia Love should win”? It seems to me that you should stop being so pusillanimous and decide whether you agree with anyone with half a brain that has analyzed the election or go with your bigoted “immutable laws of electoral Mormonism” that tell you the results based solely on religion, sex and race. I’m predicting a Mia Love victory in November; what’s your prediction? And if you do predict a Love victory (as you claim that you posted but I “missed”), please explain why “the way it is” isn’t “the way it is” in this particular case.
This reminds me of something, boy this was 10 years ago now. Some guy insisted to me that Nick Clooney was gonna beat Geoff Davis and do so easily, because he used to be a TV news anchor in the area and people loved his sister. That was actually his argument.
He doesn’t seem so dim to me anymore, comparatively speaking.
Oh, and the name of this thread is “Mia Love Clinches GOP Nomination for Congress,” so I will post here as much as I damned well please about Mia Love’s chances of winning the general election, thank you very much. But don’t worry, I won’t visit your thread entitled “Why Do Mormons Have Three Testicles?”
Yeah, that FReeper was Michael Freaking Barone compared to the “experts” on this thread.
Of course, I knew that Geoff Davis would win the second I realized that he had shaved his mustache ....
: )
We should recapture this thread as a celebration of Mia Love’s big victory, and her upcoming election to Congress in November (which has nothing to do with Mormon theology and anti-Mormon conspiracy theories). So here’s what I believe should be Mia Love’s campaign song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWnRMAVWVjk
Where did all these ranting loons come from?
Good grief.
Is this the start of a new season “only Romney, Christie, Bush” can win?
Look at the previous post, now apparently this has something to do with RINOs running for President.
This fellow is unbelievable. If you’re reading this fellow, don’t blame me for talking about you without pinging you, you ask me to stop pestering you.
But enough about him, here’s another song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GwjfUFyY6M
Sorry, we were here first. Check out the thread’s name.
So, have you made up your mind? Who is going to win the general in November, black, female, Mormon, conservative Republican Mia Love or white, male, Mormon, “moderate” Democrat Doug Owens?
Oh, and the only ones here saying that a conservative Republican can’t win are you and your anti-Mormon(ism)cohorts.
Kid in your #150 you said “Frankly, I don’t care about religions other than my own, so long as they leave me alone.”
Knowing that the Mormons would not leave you alone especially after you were dead, in #154 I mentioned the date January 2009 for a reason and PINGed my lovely FR FRiend SVCW who could also comment on this same “bothering” subject..
Until January 2009 it was possible to access the pages of the Mormon website and examine records for ones ancestors both Mormon AND non-Mormon...
What were in these records ???
The dates and places (the Mormon temples) for the so called “temple work” AKA necro baptism AKA baptism for the dead AKA dead dunking for your dead Baptist/Catholic/Method/etc Christian ancestors..
I had found many of mine who I know had died happily Christians with Christian burials and either never heard of Joey Smith or had not desired to convert to Mormonism or had died years before Mormonism was ever invented...
But now lo and behold they had been accosted and bothered AFTER their deaths by the Mormons...IOW the Mormons would not “leave them alone” even in their Christian graves...
Their records would indicate B, A, S etc..
B for baptized, dead dunked
A for anointed sometimes even a much coveted 2nd anointing
S for sealed in marriage to whomever the Mormons wanted them sealed to
and/or sealed to their children and descendants...even living descendants..making them Mormons with the same “honors” too
I found a couple of them who were so called “sealed” to all their living descendants...that meant anyone living at the time of the “sealing”
the date was the early 1950s...I was already born at that time...that made me everything the Mormons had “done” in what they called the “temple work” to my ancestor...
I was now a Mormon in the highest standing...I had the 2nd anointing etc...
and I was equal in stature to any top dead or living Mormon..
(so remember when you bash me you are bashing me cause I’m a Mormon...)
and the so called “work” is IRREVERSIBLE...there is no doctrine in the Mormon beliefs that changes that situation.. you cant lose it or have it taken off you..
Now lets look at what happened in January 2009...
Well the Mormons were busy and merrily dead dunking every pope and every monarch and every dead celebrity and person with an ancient tombstone and every person with an obituary and making up a few names and adding their names to the Mormon membership rolls and to their FamilySearch website...if your ancestor is in there he or she was dead dunked...
Ann Frank was dead dunked into Mormonism..
Hitler and thousands of his Jewish victims became Mormons through dead dunking...
Father Damian of the leper colony in Hawaii was not only dead dunked out of Christianity and into Mormon but also “married” to a dead woman he probably had never met...
Jesus Christ was dead dunked several times at different Mormon temples and “married” at various times to Mary Magdalene, and Mary and Martha...and was fortunate enough to be worthy of the 2nd anointing...
The Mormons continued to dead dunk Jews, the Jews appealed to the Mormons in vain to quit the ugly horrifyi9ng practice, Helen Rakey exposed them and we got to access their very open pages for the stomach churning evil they had afflicted on the good Christian names of our ancestors..
and as SVCW will tell you sometimes the Mormons dead dunked people who are still alive...
Then the stuff really hit the fan...
In June 2008 someone dead dunked Stanley Ann Dunham...
Happy atheist Stan Ann was dead dunked into Mormonism, “married” to Barak Obama Senior, a polygamist with 3 other living wives, given the 2nd anointing and every other possible honor that was in the Mormon crown jewels...
and then she was SEALED to her children thus passing on everything the Mormons had given her....and it all was IRREVERSIBLE...
and so her son Barak Obama Junior and her daughter Maya Soetoro became top echelon Mormons and in Nov of that year 2008 we had our very first MORMON PRESIDENT ...
I was able to read the records and so did many other people..
there was no doubt about it..
Barak Obama was a Mormon president and horrors he was a black man...
and so when it was reported that someone had dead dunked Stan Ann (by that time she had been dunked 2 or 3 times) and it might just be objectionable..(the Mormon president who happened to be BLACK) the Mormons promised they would change things...
but of course they cant and they couldn’t no matter how much they wanted to...
No dead dunked person ever apostatized and lost their Mormonism..
so they did the only and next best thing..
They closed their pages to the smiling faces and refused access to all but TBMs true believing Mormons who were given the codes to see those pages..and pretended it never happened..
as of Jan 2009..
so now although strangers can access the pages listing your ancestors you cant see them causes ya aint worthy enough...
Frankly I didn’t think the Mormons would go that far to cover up the sickening religious practice they were doing but they did..after all it was unBiblical and belonged in the dark..
However I do have printed pages of the records of my own ancestors and there on the page is the evidence much like there still is to this day for Stanley Ann Dunham and her son the Mormon president of the United States..
B, S, A baptized, sealed, anointed etc etc...
and if you were also here in FR before Jan 2009 you might have read about this Mormon craziness in other threads...
PING to the ever wonderful SVCW
:)
PING to #199
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.