Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/29/2014 7:54:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
Even the ‘Wise Latina’ is jumping on the race-baiting bandwagon.

She giggled when her college buddies suggested her kind doesn't interpret law, they twist it to conform to their worldview. Jurisprudence...ha!

2 posted on 04/29/2014 7:58:40 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Tagline


3 posted on 04/29/2014 7:58:51 AM PDT by tophat9000 (Per PC left logic, the only problem with racism is the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Some people are born stupid. It is sad so many of such are in government.


4 posted on 04/29/2014 7:59:54 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The incompetance of a liberal is almost without measure.

The incompetance of a quota liberal is indeed without measure.


6 posted on 04/29/2014 8:04:34 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Justice Sotomayor: Saying it’s so, Makes it so”

That only works with God, dear woman.

(You are not God.)


9 posted on 04/29/2014 8:11:33 AM PDT by Repent and Believe (Promote good. Tolerate the harmless. Let evil be crushed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"As members of the judiciary tasked with intervening to carry out the guarantee of equal protection, we ought not sit back and wish away, rather than confront, the racial inequality that exists in our society. It is this view that works harm, by perpetuating the facile notion that what makes race matter is acknowledging the simple truth that race does matter."

What an arrogant and non-sensical statement. First, who would be the ultimate judge on how much was equal or fair? Would it be based upon national population? Regional? Local?

Her second sentence is rediculously ambiguous. Is she saying that acknowledging that race matters is working harm or just the opposite? Was she drinking when she wrote this tripe? If she wished to officially acknowledge that race matters, then she has just indicated that Government is racially biased and that is unconstitutional.

This broad should be impeached.

10 posted on 04/29/2014 8:16:05 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

2 NYC judges on the SCOTUS, really? And you really expect miracles? It seems we let the N/E Liberals control the nation.


12 posted on 04/29/2014 8:16:58 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (2016 an election or a coronation of a Queen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Yes, the late George Orwell saw it coming. It is hard to imagine Orwell expressing surprise or shock at the willingness -- the eagerness -- of a political faction to tie facts into bowlines and square knots while claiming brazenly to be doing just the opposite. A society without a moral center -- ours, for instance -- is up for grabs. The shouters have only to shout more loudly than anyone else.

Yes, Orwell might have characterized such nonsense as doubleplusgood duckspeak. Haunting how clear was his vision.

I urge all Freepers to read/reread 1984.

13 posted on 04/29/2014 8:19:02 AM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Saying it’s so makes it so..... works for me....BTW all liberal justices are no longer on the Supreme Court. I just love saying that.


15 posted on 04/29/2014 8:24:20 AM PDT by rod1 (CTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

One of my favorites sayings is: “You may be entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.”

Sotomayor is a disgraceful excuse for a judge, much less a Supreme Court Justice.


16 posted on 04/29/2014 8:38:22 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So we have a Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t acknowledge that race-based privileges are illegal, wrong, and unconstitutional.


17 posted on 04/29/2014 8:50:38 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Loosen up, FRiends - cut the “wise Latina Female” some slack.

How would you like to go through life fat, ugly to the bone, and knowing your presence on SCOTUS is because of Affirmative Action?


19 posted on 04/29/2014 9:29:03 AM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est - because of what Islam is and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

they really are going full monkeysh1t insane now.

and believing their insanity is brilliance.


20 posted on 04/29/2014 10:24:36 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

how 1984 of her.

she should never have passed the bar let alone become a judge.


23 posted on 04/29/2014 5:11:10 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson