Please ping me to aviation and aerospace articles. Thank you.
If you want added to or removed from this ping list, please contact EveningStar or Paleo Conservative.
Posted on 05/03/2014 1:15:20 PM PDT by george76
Practicing for martial law and CWII.
Yes - it made me look for the use of heavy duty RADAR or jamming. Instead, the unit just beat itself to death - "Toast" probably applies....
Please ping me to aviation and aerospace articles. Thank you.
If you want added to or removed from this ping list, please contact EveningStar or Paleo Conservative.
Please ping me with any Southern California related articles. Thank you!
If you want on or off this ping list, please FReepmail me.
Sounds like U2K to me.
As I recall, there was one time that an EA-6B prowler switched on it's ECM systems off the East Coast, and shut pretty much shut down ATC radar all up and down the east coast.
Mark
Thanks to Y2K testing, we learned that a certain municipal fueling station (for police & fire vehicles) would have failed on 1/1/2000, and we contacted the manufacturer of the pumps and auditing systems for an update.
In the simulation, the pumps simply stopped working.
Mark
Military air traffic out of Nellis AFB passes thu this air traffic control system every day and has done so for many many years. U-2’s, SR-71’s, RF-4C’s etc. if this were a real fault it would be happening all the time and have been corrected.
So either they had a component failure or this was human error.
Thank you for telling us the real story. What a misleading headline.
I didn't buy TP again until last year.
I call BS. I have a wife, and judging by the rate in which she goes through toilet paper, then multiplying by four for the presence of at least four women in your household, you'd have to had to had bought at minimum 2 truckloads of TP in order for it to last 13 years.
The math doesn't lie.
The number was likely stored as an “unsigned integer” in 2 bytes, meaning the max value would be 64535 ... plenty for practically all air traffic, but “rolling over” (subtracting 64536 until it fits) for anything over that. This was long the norm in programming. So...a U2 comes by at 85000 ft, registers as 20000 ft, and lots of traffic around that level goes into a panic.
LAX needs a shorter leash.
I’ve been on passenger jets where the captain has announce that we will be cruising at 34,000. So a computer that couldn’t handle altitudes over 32,768 couldn’t handle routine flight operations.
“Fried the computers???”
I find it unlikely any hardware was fried, but I can see that if the software went into a “loop”, and tried repeatedly query the contact, and run any de-conflict, or collision avoidance issue looking at it in a “2D” environment, it does seem like our ATC system is again starting to fail us...
It is already, probably, going to have deadly results before anything is really done about this...
You are quite welcome, Sir.
As an aviation professional, it often seems the media is only interested in sensationalism, not the often boring facts.
But I'm sure other professions suffer the same treatment.
You guys didn't notice the problem because thousands of programmers like me took care of it, thank you very much. I was part of the generation that created the "problem" in the first place (out of necessity) and we were also the ones to solve it. So yes, there was a Y2K problem, just like there were WMDs in Iraq.
When you read about aviation in the media and you see the gross incaccuraccies it confirms your suspicions about the rest of the reporting.
I got divorced a year later, so it was just for a single guy. Your argument is invalid.
It lasted a decade.
/johnny
Must have been aliens....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.