did she really say that??
So it can be a mans’ choice now? Against the will of a woman?
Feminists won’t like this.
“...did she really say that??”
You took the words right off of my keyboard.
Well, I’m too lazy to read the article, maybe she was saying they shouldn’t be punished as though they had committed murder, or something like that.
Obviously it’s clearly illicit (and should be illegal) to “slip” anyone medication of any sort without that person’s knowledge or consent.
She didn't have time to think this through. Her instinct is to support baby-killing regardless of circumstances.
In this case, her irrational principles were in conflict. The typical moonbat reaction to such a situation is to suppress the conflicting thoughts, or to simply change the subject. Neither option was open to her, and the result was predictable.
Excerpted from the article -
“The foundation for Wasserman Schultz’s opposition sounds eerily like the excuse President Barack Obama gave as an Illinois state senator when he “voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion.” He claimed, as National Review described it in 2012, that “by providing legal protection and ‘recognition as a human person’ for a pre-viable infant, the law could be used to threaten Roe v. Wade.”
Here is the “logic” to which Wasserman Schultz has apparently signed on:
Critics argued that the bill would confer “personhood” on all unborn babies, from the moment of conception, perhaps leading to a ban on abortions and many forms of birth control.
In other words, “We can’t allow anything to happen which could in any conceivable way recognize the a pre-born baby’s humanity, even if it means that fathers or others can get away with killing an unborn child the mother has chosen to carry to term.”
So much for the term “pro-choice.” Thomas Lifson at American Thinker money line: “The mind boggles at this war on women.” Indeed.
As usual, the press is doing its utmost to ensure that a leftist’s outrageous comment doesn’t get noticed by the general public. A Google News search on “Wasserman Schultz abortion” (not in quotes) at 9:45 a.m. ET returned 11 items, none of which are establishment press outlets.”
Unbelievable. It is assault, plain and simple — against the woman, and against the baby.
she has no moral compass, no intellectual integrity.
I’ve always said that if it’s a woman’s choice then it should also be a man’s choice.
There are no feminists these days - they have devolved into Satan's minions.